Comments Thread For: Jeff Horn Wants Terence Crawford Rematch - in Australia

[Santa_]

Bwahaha, Horn just went full Donald.

[Combat Talk Radio]

still vastly inferior to Crawford. Not sure what you're debating.

Crawford has ONE big name: Gamboa, and even that's debatable. You're going off eye test rather than resume - which is fine, but let's just be clear here.

Jeff "Legend Killer" Horn has FOUR names, all with decisive endings.

Crawford beating Horn puts him up there in rankings in my book, but while Crawford continues on his trend of fighting lesser fighters elsewise, Horn is going after top dogs.

Who gets my respeck? The Hornet.

[Combat Talk Radio]

gamboa rocked crawford. crawford looked in control for the majority of the fight with horn.

Gamboa in no way "rocked" Crawford. He got a good shot that made Crawford reset, but couldn't follow up. Other than that it was a chess match.

i like horn, hes all guts but hes not on crawford's level.

I don't disagree. However, there were a lot of factors at play in that fight. I want to know if Crawford does as well without a su****ious hand injury delay that throws off fighter prep - as one example. He probably does, but if a rematch goes and Horn takes Crawford the distance winning 6 rounds, it basically means the first was a fluke. That potential interests me with any fighter.

[Jab jab boom]

Crawford has ONE big name: Gamboa, and even that's debatable. You're going off eye test rather than resume - which is fine, but let's just be clear here.

Jeff "Legend Killer" Horn has FOUR names, all with decisive endings.

Crawford beating Horn puts him up there in rankings in my book, but while Crawford continues on his trend of fighting lesser fighters elsewise, Horn is going after top dogs.

Who gets my respeck? The Hornet.

who gets your respect is irrelevant. And it's laughable that you say horn is going after top dogs. He's just fought a 43 yr old c level fighter. In the ring, Crawford decisively dominated horn. There is no need for a rematch and he'll never get one. Again, I'm not even sure what you're trying to debate.

[Combat Talk Radio]

He's just fought and retired a guy who has solid wins over Soliman, Mosley, Green and Geale.

Yes, that's correct.

He fought and stopped a guy who was once considered one of the most dangerous punchers in the game.

Yes, that's correct.

He fought and stopped a guy who knocked out a guy that absolutely dominated a prime Erik Morales that was fresh off dominating a prime Manny Pacquiao.

Yes, that's correct.

He UNANIMOUSLY beat Manny Pacquiao at the Battle of Brisbane, fresh off dominant wins over prime Jessie Vargas and prime Timothy Bradley.

Yes, that's correct.

who gets your respect is irrelevant.

So is Crawford's resume in comparison.

Done.

[Jab jab boom]

Yes, that's correct.



Yes, that's correct.



Yes, that's correct.



Yes, that's correct.




So is Crawford's resume in comparison.

Done.

are you seriously going to these lengths to defend Jeff horn as an elite guy?? Lmaoooo, cut it out. It's pathetic.

[PoserExposer]

You have nothing to prove other than admit the WBO was rightfully beaten out of you because it never belonged to you in the first place.

[TJ highway]

are you seriously going to these lengths to defend Jeff horn as an elite guy?? Lmaoooo, cut it out. It's pathetic.

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/Hk04hIz9UENuo/*****.gif[/IMG]