Comments Thread For: Sanchez: They Are All Using Golovkin's Name To Stay Relevant!

[livershot73]

Golovkin COULD have taken these fights, but he CHOSE not to

NOTE: please do not promptly provide me with 8 silly excuses..... because I will shred those silly excuses, again..... as we have heard them all before

I am not asking if you can make up an excuse to attempt to justify why these fights did not happen..... I am simply saying that Golovkin COULD easily have taken these fights, but he CHOSE not to

could have fought Lara........... but CHOSE not to
could have fought Ward.......... but CHOSE not to
could have fought Mora.......... but CHOSE not to
could have fought Cotto.......... but CHOSE not to
could have fought Saunders..... but CHOSE not to
could have fought Derevy........ but CHOSE not to
could have fought Charlo......... but CHOSE not to

could have fought Canelo at 155..... but he CHOSE not to

I included Canelo because if the red kid had not sacked up, Golovkin would have missed that fight as well

the point is..... Mr "anyone from 154-168" did not lift so much as his little finger to make those fights, and they were ALL there for the taking..... quite the contrary, they ignored those fights, Charlo is just the latest example

if you reply with a bunch of silly excuses, you will prove that the guys who are accusing Golovkin fans of being excuse-making muppets, are correct..... because all I am saying is that Golovkin COULD easily have taken these fights, but he CHOSE not to..... for whatever silly reason you want to insert

we can all come up with reasons why every fight in history should not have happened, but who would bother doing that.....?

the fact that there are 8 possible fights..... (all of them ranging from a top 4 opponent, to very best opponent, on Golovkin's shabby resume)..... is no coincidence

it was no accident that happened..... it was a gameplan

your challenge is to keep it real

LOL, wait...you want me to “keep it real” but yet you refuse to hear a rebuttal as to your one-sided opinion because, then, you would chalk it up to “silly excuses” huh? Uh yeah, there’s no such thing as a healthy debate with any member of the CC Club then, I guess...because you sure like to dish out your own theories but cannot tolerate someone else’s view that doesn’t agree with yours....

Sorry “mate”, but here in the real world, agreeing to disagree and a difference in opinions is part of the sport we love....you’ll understand someday, when you’re an adult.

No need to answer any of your super biased 8 ”examples” as you’ve already clarified you’re more than unwilling to be a reasonable boxing fan and listen to someone else’s take....even though you also provided this “gem”

“we can all come up with reasons why every fight in history should not have happened, but who would bother doing that.....?“

Uh, You just did, but I guess it’s ok because, you, along with the others on here, just hate Golovkin more than the civilized world hates the Kardashians, apparently ...

However...

It wasn’t Gennady that said “anyone from 154-168” or whatever, I’ve already clarified that to another CC VIP member and his reply was something along the lines of stumbling all over his own bs and calling me a liar DESPITE me providing a link to the published article at the time....but since you’ve already oh-so-wisely determined that everyone else except you is full of “silly muppet excuses”, you can look it up for yourself.....

Canelo “sacked up”, huh? Was that before or after he sacked the WBC 160 lb belt rather than defend it when Golovkin was his mandatory in 2015?

And neither one of those are “silly excuses”, just FACTS that happen to be public knowledge and are only a google search away!

Cheers!

[livershot73]

You dumb azzz when did I say Canelo won every round or shut GGG out? I said as plain as can be Canelo convincingly won the fight and broke GGG's face. If either of those comments get your panties in a bunch then oh phuking well truth hurts. I already know what GGG looked like in the brook fight I posted the pic of GGG at the press conference with Canelo and then in comparison showed you a full video of what GGG looked like after the Brook fight when he did a interview with Fat Boy dan immediately after his press conference. He did all those interviews without hiding his face but with Canelo he wore shades why? Because he face was mangled. And still you can't find 1 pic of his face worse then Canelo made it so cut the shyt he's not Gatti or a fighter with bad skin who bruises and cuts every fight. His face was phuked up because of Canelo and not some genetic reason of having bad skins that tear every fight.

But keep making excuses and crying because GGG the man you and his idiot team said would easily KO canelo and begged to fight him Mexican Style saw Mexican Style and bytched up tapping out a Mexican Style fight. He got walked down and his face Broken by the smaller man who he accused of running from him. That's what you don't get it's not just that he lost it's how lost after all the shyt he and his fans said. Then lost in the most disgraceful manner running out the ring pulling a broner. Then showing up the press conference forgetting how to speak english behaving like a **** victim hiding behind a translator. Then running to hide under a rock in kazaphukstan while his promoter makes a total azzz out himself crying, excuse making, throwing out conspiracy and accusations. And you still wonder why fans are clowning those bytches. You are a prime example of his fanbase a bunch of sore loser excuse making phuks.

Oh for f.uck’s sake you ****** turd, get off of big momma’s couch and apply for your G.E.D. Maybe you’ll learn some reading comprehension. I attributed GGG’s bruising to Canelo’s accuracy in part. But that has no bearing on it making it a convincing win unless you’re judging a beauty contest. So being that this fight was between 2 men and you thought Canelo came out prettier, THAT MAKES YOU A F.AG,....it’s ok, not entirely your fault since you were probably turned out while serving time for stealing Now & Laters at the corner market.....

I also said, numerous times, that GGG leaving the ring and not granting a post fight interview was a total let down....let’s see what else? Oh yeah, that GGG not stepping up to the Mexican Style he asked for is all HIS FAULT. Him and his team have NO ONE ELSE to blame but THEMSELVES.

For the record, and for the f.ucking umpteenth time, I HAVE NO ISSUE with the official verdict. But you go on like a broken record repeating and regurgitating your same infantile diatribe, as if only trying to convince yourself that “Canelo won so convincingly” while having a.nal ******s...Sorry, you $3 hoe, but the FACT is it WASN’T a convincing win....one round doesn’t make it convincing .....I know you hate to hear it, but it is what it is.

IT WASN’T A CONVINCING WIN. THIS IS WHY LOTS OF PEOPLE WANT TO SEE A THIRD ENCOUNTER. HAD IT BEEN SO CONVINCING, EVEN THE POWERS THAT BE (GOLDEN BOY INCLUDED) WOULD’NT BE TALKING ABOUT A 3RD FIGHT.

Now please....whatever you do, do not run out to release your pre-menstrual frustrations by beating on one of your female cousins for not wanting to give you some and then talking s’hit to the po-po after she calls 911 on your ass...you should already be fully aware how that usually ends for you people, so please man, don’t do it! I don’t want to see your sorry @ss on CNN tomorrow morning!

It’s ONLY A SPORT and besides, YOUR MAN was awarded the victory! So relax, go have a 40 and SUCK A ****!

[aboutfkntime]

LOL, wait...you want me to “keep it real” but yet you refuse to hear a rebuttal as to your one-sided opinion because, then, you would chalk it up to “silly excuses” huh? Uh yeah, there’s no such thing as a healthy debate with any member of the CC Club then, I guess...because you sure like to dish out your own theories but cannot tolerate someone else’s view that doesn’t agree with yours....

Sorry “mate”, but here in the real world, agreeing to disagree and a difference in opinions is part of the sport we love....you’ll understand someday, when you’re an adult.

No need to answer any of your super biased 8 ”examples” as you’ve already clarified you’re more than unwilling to be a reasonable boxing fan and listen to someone else’s take....even though you also provided this “gem”

“we can all come up with reasons why every fight in history should not have happened, but who would bother doing that.....?“

Uh, You just did, but I guess it’s ok because, you, along with the others on here, just hate Golovkin more than the civilized world hates the Kardashians, apparently ...

However...

It wasn’t Gennady that said “anyone from 154-168” or whatever, I’ve already clarified that to another CC VIP member and his reply was something along the lines of stumbling all over his own bs and calling me a liar DESPITE me providing a link to the published article at the time....but since you’ve already oh-so-wisely determined that everyone else except you is full of “silly muppet excuses”, you can look it up for yourself.....

Canelo “sacked up”, huh? Was that before or after he sacked the WBC 160 lb belt rather than defend it when Golovkin was his mandatory in 2015?

And neither one of those are “silly excuses”, just FACTS that happen to be public knowledge and are only a google search away!

Cheers!

you excuse-making muppet

Golovkin Aims High and Low: Would Fight Ward at 168 and Canelo at 154.....
http://thaboxingvoice.com/golovkin-a...-at-154/15398/

I asked you not to supply me with a silly childish excuse

but, you just couldn't help it LMAO

Golovkin absolutely said that 154-168 rubbish himself, many times

anyway you dumb kid, this is how the adult world works.....

FACT: a fighter is 100% responsible/accountable for the words of his OFFICIAL representatives

and, are you fkn serious?..... they played that lame 154-168 card for SIX YEARS..... it was OBVIOUSLY a planned marketing ploy, and guess what..... not once did I hear Golovkin contradict those words

you said that you were not going to make childish excuses

and then you made the most childish excuse of them all LMAO

give it a rest, the jug is up

Golovkin fell waaaaay short of his hype..... both regarding opponent selection, and regarding his performance against Canelo in the rematch

[aboutfkntime]

LOL, wait...you want me to “keep it real” but yet you refuse to hear a rebuttal as to your one-sided opinion because, then, you would chalk it up to “silly excuses” huh? Uh yeah, there’s no such thing as a healthy debate with any member of the CC Club then, I guess...because you sure like to dish out your own theories but cannot tolerate someone else’s view that doesn’t agree with yours....

come on then, lets hear your dumb excuses lol



1) he made a bunch of silly excuses to avoid Sergio Mora in a showcase on HBO, preferring instead to fight a NO-HOPER in Monaco on free-TV

Mora was an ex-champ who had clearly faded, which is the ideal opponent for a young fighter attempting to establish himself on the world-stage..... boxing has always worked that way.....

NOT saying that Golovkin could not have beaten Mora, just that the Latin Snake is a known mover/spoiler who is notoriously difficult to look good against..... and they were not willing to risk failing to put Mora away, looking bad in the process, or..... worse

when I heard Loeffler stuttering and stammering his way through half-a-dozen silly excuses, I knew what was up..... that was ridiculous..... because insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not an unknown NO-HOPER on free TV who is WORSE

missing opportunities like that, and with guys like Cotto..... is why Golovkin only has 97k fans..... he needed those type of fights

2) they did the exact same thing to Lara and Ward, who are both also known mover/spoilers who are notoriously difficult to look good against.....

Lara would have been Golovkin's best opponent to date at that point..... and once again, insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not guys like Willie Monroe, Wade, Brook, etc.....

3) Ward..... they promised to fight Ward at 168..... a) they killed the fight in June 2015 by demanding a catchweight they knew would kill the fight..... b) in September 2015 they refused that fight in 36 minutes flat

4) the superstar Cotto, should have been the ultimate goal of every fighter from 140-160..... at that point in time, Cotto was the very best option, because May/Pac were totally unrealistic and never going to happen

Mr " anyone from 154-168 " totally refusing to negotiate on weight with the little old faded SUPERSTAR Miguel Cotto..... is the 2nd most bizarre occurrence within boxing that I have witnessed within the last decade

I cannot believe how little was spoken about that situation, both from the media and from the fans..... totally bizarre..... every other fighter from 140-160 would have cut off one of his fingers for that fight, and yet Golovkin would not so much as lift his little finger to make that fight, totally refusing to drop a single pound to fight the 153lb superstar

then a few months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo..... Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154 but nobody would step up..... WTF???

those are the exact type of fights that Golovkin should have taken

5) they specifically promised to fight Canelo at 154..... but as above, when shht got real they tucked tail and ran from that fight..... and just like above, 6 months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo, Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154, but nobody would step up.....



6) Derevyanchenko - and Golovkin got stripped

7) Saunders..... why the fcuk would Golovkin select a total NO-HOPER in Vanes, when Saunders was running around with his "dream"..... calling him Pvssy-Borat.,.... and offering to fight him in June???

a unification > a mando, so Golovkin would not have been stripped for refusing to fight Derevyanchenko..... instead, Golovkin avoided TWO threats, selected an inactive JMW, and got stripped for his troubles in the process.....

the very second that Saunders said he was available, there was no other fight to make..... Munguia, Spike, and Vanes..... should never have been mentioned

..... come on, that is the 3rd most bizarre situation within the sport of boxing that I have ever witnessed..... two of those situations being created by Golovkin

8) Golovkin ducked Charlo

if you think all of that happened by coincidence, you are a fkn dreamer

stop licking Golovkin's sack and then expecting old school fans to applaud you for it..... MANY established journalists have said the exact same thing..... which is why you should have smartened up

[livershot73]

come on then, lets hear your dumb excuses lol



1) he made a bunch of silly excuses to avoid Sergio Mora in a showcase on HBO, preferring instead to fight a NO-HOPER in Monaco on free-TV

Mora was an ex-champ who had clearly faded, which is the ideal opponent for a young fighter attempting to establish himself on the world-stage..... boxing has always worked that way.....

NOT saying that Golovkin could not have beaten Mora, just that the Latin Snake is a known mover/spoiler who is notoriously difficult to look good against..... and they were not willing to risk failing to put Mora away, looking bad in the process, or..... worse

when I heard Loeffler stuttering and stammering his way through half-a-dozen silly excuses, I knew what was up..... that was ridiculous..... because insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not an unknown NO-HOPER on free TV who is WORSE

missing opportunities like that, and with guys like Cotto..... is why Golovkin only has 97k fans..... he needed those type of fights

2) they did the exact same thing to Lara and Ward, who are both also known mover/spoilers who are notoriously difficult to look good against.....

Lara would have been Golovkin's best opponent to date at that point..... and once again, insisting that someone is irrelevant, and not a draw..... only works if you fight someone relevant who IS a draw..... not guys like Willie Monroe, Wade, Brook, etc.....

3) Ward..... they promised to fight Ward at 168..... a) they killed the fight in June 2015 by demanding a catchweight they knew would kill the fight..... b) in September 2015 they refused that fight in 36 minutes flat

4) the superstar Cotto, should have been the ultimate goal of every fighter from 140-160..... at that point in time, Cotto was the very best option, because May/Pac were totally unrealistic and never going to happen

Mr " anyone from 154-168 " totally refusing to negotiate on weight with the little old faded SUPERSTAR Miguel Cotto..... is the 2nd most bizarre occurrence within boxing that I have witnessed within the last decade

I cannot believe how little was spoken about that situation, both from the media and from the fans..... totally bizarre..... every other fighter from 140-160 would have cut off one of his fingers for that fight, and yet Golovkin would not so much as lift his little finger to make that fight, totally refusing to drop a single pound to fight the 153lb superstar

then a few months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo..... Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154 but nobody would step up..... WTF???

those are the exact type of fights that Golovkin should have taken

5) they specifically promised to fight Canelo at 154..... but as above, when shht got real they tucked tail and ran from that fight..... and just like above, 6 months after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto and Canelo, Golovkin threw up his hands in frustration and claimed that he was willing and able to fight at 154, but nobody would step up.....



6) Derevyanchenko - and Golovkin got stripped

7) Saunders..... why the fcuk would Golovkin select a total NO-HOPER in Vanes, when Saunders was running around with his "dream"..... calling him Pvssy-Borat.,.... and offering to fight him in June???

a unification > a mando, so Golovkin would not have been stripped for refusing to fight Derevyanchenko..... instead, Golovkin avoided TWO threats, selected an inactive JMW, and got stripped for his troubles in the process.....

the very second that Saunders said he was available, there was no other fight to make..... Munguia, Spike, and Vanes..... should never have been mentioned

..... come on, that is the 3rd most bizarre situation within the sport of boxing that I have ever witnessed..... two of those situations being created by Golovkin

8) Golovkin ducked Charlo

if you think all of that happened by coincidence, you are a fkn dreamer

stop licking Golovkin's sack and then expecting old school fans to applaud you for it..... MANY established journalists have said the exact same thing..... which is why you should have smartened up

look here Brit B.itch Boy, it's Thanksgiving week here in The States, which is a holiday...a REAL one, not a vacation, as you f@gs tend to call vacation time as "ooo mummy, I'm taking a holiday, bloody hell!" with your gay-@ss accent and vocabulary...I'll gladly get back to you on your points and have no qualms with clarifying on which I agree and on which I don't...you know why? because I'm NOT a fan-puta like you and your fellow Canela Cum-guzzling C.unts...

I'll get back to you soon enough, but in the meantime, keep fisting your sshole while obsessing over Canelo's pics, Mr. Bean Queen.

[aboutfkntime]

look here Brit B.itch Boy, it's Thanksgiving week here in The States, which is a holiday...a REAL one, not a vacation, as you f@gs tend to call vacation time as "ooo mummy, I'm taking a holiday, bloody hell!" with your gay-@ss accent and vocabulary...I'll gladly get back to you on your points and have no qualms with clarifying on which I agree and on which I don't...you know why? because I'm NOT a fan-puta like you and your fellow Canela Cum-guzzling C.unts

I am not a brit, you halfwit.....

and seriously, that other dribble you just wrote.....

..... what does all that dumb shlt actually mean ?

I'll get back to you soon enough, but in the meantime, keep fisting your sshole while obsessing over Canelo's pics, Mr. Bean Queen.

yea, you do that.....

here is your main problem.....



Golovkin's legacy, in 20 years.....

boxing fan 1: hey, remember that Borat guy, the middleweight

boxing fan 2: who ?

boxing fan 1: you know, that guy..... Golovkin

boxing fan 2: nope

boxing fan 1: you know, the foreign guy everyone made fun of

boxing fan 2: nope, who'd he beat ?

boxing fan 1: ummm, not sure..... nobody really

boxing fan 2: nope, don't remember him

boxing fan 1: hey, remember that guy Broner...... he was a good fighter, funny too

boxing fan 2: yea, I remember him..... funny dude, good fighter

[ThomasJK]

GGG will return and claim his belts back in due time. Id like to see him fight any of the three or four claimers in his next bout. The man is pissed off and will punish whoever stands opposite from him in the ring.

[aboutfkntime]

GGG will return and claim his belts back in due time. Id like to see him fight any of the three or four claimers in his next bout. The man is pissed off and will punish whoever stands opposite from him in the ring.

come on

he already passed on Jacobs, Saunders, Charlo, Derevyanchenko

he obviously aint gonna fight any of those lions man