Comments Thread For: WBA Won't Strip Charr; Miller-Dinu Unlikely To Be Title Fight
Collapse
-
I realize that but it wasn’t a paper title. GGG willing gave that title up to face Vanes. Just like not Andrade fault BJS popped. And Farmer got robbed in his title fight and dude popped after. U can’t compare that to inventing a title for Tank. Same way the did for Broner to klimov off a loss too. WBA does that for HaymonComment
-
actually he did beat the super champ. And he beat him at a weight disadvantage. Tank fought some featherweight who was inactive for a year and coming off a loss for a title that didn’t exist. Big difference.Comment
-
Yet more proof that the WBA "regular" belt is not a World title, but a mere sub-champ belt.
The sanctioning bodies need to get back to having just one World title each, with a proper points-based ranking system that is public for fans to view. At the moment there is just no trust from the average boxing fan that the sanctioning bodies are run in a way that is completely legal and fair to the boxers that fight under their banner.
There are far too many boxers ranked high enough to get a title shot that have done little to justify their lofty positions - apart from maybe buying their way up the rankings.Comment
-
Comment
-
They just need to make a few changes to stop further descent into idiocy - chief among them would be only recognizing 1 World champ at each weight instead of 2 and in some cases 3.
All of the sanctioning bodies could do with a more evidence based ranking system though, and all have at least a few boxers in questionably high positions in their rankings.
The WBA are not the only ones who are a bit dodgy, all of them are guilty of at least a few dubious practices.Comment
-
Comment
Comment