Usyk is a good fighter but it would be ****** to even compare him to the Real Deal. Holyfield was a more complete fighter a d would take Usyk out before the 10th.
Why do people always feel it necessary to "rate" everyone like this from different eras. You'd never know the outcome unless they actually fought each other, which isn't going to happen. Holyfield was an amazing athlete with a HUGE heart. But as was said "Evan Fields" was also juiced to the moon and looked like a friggin bodybuilder. I mean that has to count for at least a SMALL part of his success. He also fought pretty dirty at times. Usyk has a very special skillset and is a great already just based on what he's already done. Nevermind what he may accomplish in the future. He also is a fantastic role model for others to follow. Why try to downplay either's achievements? What purpose does that serve?
Comment