Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao on Mayweather: It Wasn't Clear Who Won, I Was Injured

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jas View Post
    Cant keep using injury as an excuse

    You fought with it

    Was a very close fight

    I had it 7 5 floyd i think but can be convinced pac won or a draw if i watched it again. But its a **** fight and was rooting for pac so not gonna watch it again


    dayummm

    props to you Sir

    Comment


    • Originally posted by WholeSoul75 View Post
      Nothing in those points proved anything against the data the scientist stated. If you knew the truth and we're accused by a jealous co worker i wouldn't agree the accusers demands to prove my point. Thats how I roll. All the scientist data shows that your su****ion can also be wrong. Data vs belief/bias.

      https://www.badlefthook.com/platform...d-analysts-and

      What's rubbish in the article and what does that mean?


      " data " ?

      " scientist " ?

      who give a flying fat fk about that

      knowledge and common-sense > that stuff

      Pac skipped through THREE DIVISIONS in 9 months, gaining 12lbs of muscle..... increasing his speed/power and (get this) punch output..... while looking as fresh as a daisy..... wtf?

      you know absolutely nothing about boxing if that does not seem su****ious to you

      Pac turned from a shopworn fighter, into a 1200+ punch dynamo, who (coincidentally) refused to test..... then, Pac just as suddenly reverted back into a normal 400-500 punch fighter who looked tired at the end of a fight, and (coincidentally) he suddenly had no problem taking blood tests

      puh-leez

      Comment


      • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        " data " ?

        " scientist " ?

        who give a flying fat fk about that

        knowledge and common-sense > that stuff

        Pac skipped through THREE DIVISIONS in 9 months, gaining 12lbs of muscle..... increasing his speed/power and (get this) punch output..... while looking as fresh as a daisy..... wtf?

        you know absolutely nothing about boxing if that does not seem su****ious to you

        Pac turned from a shopworn fighter, into a 1200+ punch dynamo, who (coincidentally) refused to test..... then, Pac just as suddenly reverted back into a normal 400-500 punch fighter who looked tired at the end of a fight, and (coincidentally) he suddenly had no problem taking blood tests

        puh-leez

        Damnnn who cares??? ALL your points were answered in the article. Gain some insight.


        https://www.badlefthook.com/2011/3/1...d-analysts-and

        Comment


        • Originally posted by WholeSoul75 View Post
          Damnnn who cares??? ALL your points were answered in the article. Gain some insight.


          https://www.badlefthook.com/2011/3/1...d-analysts-and


          what a load of BOLLOCKS !!

          what that link proved.....

          1) boxing is not a math's game
          2) such analysis is largely irrelevant, but should at least be performed by someone with a knowledge of the sweet science, and of fighters

          there have been HUNDREDS, probably THOUSANDS of fighters with Manny's physical characteristics..... so, bollocks !!

          there was nothing in that article that explained this.....

          Pac skipped through THREE DIVISIONS in 9 months, gaining 12lbs of muscle..... increasing his speed/power and (get this) punch output..... while looking as fresh as a daisy..... wtf?

          you know absolutely nothing about boxing if that does not seem su****ious to you

          Pac turned from a shopworn fighter, into a 1200+ punch dynamo, who (coincidentally) refused to test..... then, Pac just as suddenly reverted back into a normal 400-500 punch fighter who looked tired at the end of a fight, and (coincidentally) he suddenly had no problem taking blood tests
          if you disagree, tell me what you saw

          and Pac's " decline " started at the exact same time he finally agreed to drug testing

          just like Golovkin's " decline " started at the exact same time he stepped up his competition

          Comment


          • that link is proof that Occam's Razor is the way to go.....

            forget the airy-fairy stuff..... what most likely happened ?

            Comment


            • It was obvious, though. Close fight, but still kinda obvious Floyd won.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                " data " ?

                " scientist " ?

                who give a flying fat fk about that

                knowledge and common-sense > that stuff

                Pac skipped through THREE DIVISIONS in 9 months, gaining 12lbs of muscle..... increasing his speed/power and (get this) punch output..... while looking as fresh as a daisy..... wtf?

                you know absolutely nothing about boxing if that does not seem su****ious to you

                Pac turned from a shopworn fighter, into a 1200+ punch dynamo, who (coincidentally) refused to test..... then, Pac just as suddenly reverted back into a normal 400-500 punch fighter who looked tired at the end of a fight, and (coincidentally) he suddenly had no problem taking blood tests

                puh-leez
                When you put it that way its very hard to argue against, his most gullible fans would rather ride with lost and found God while getting cramps at the pearly gates .

                Comment


                • Mayweather edged it 7-5. I think may still beats pax. Pac is worn. Broner probably will beat him

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Mash121 View Post
                    Mayweather edged it 7-5. I think may still beats pax. Pac is worn. Broner probably will beat him

                    please don't say that

                    I am hoping Pac beats the snot out of Broner

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      what a load of BOLLOCKS !!

                      what that link proved.....

                      1) boxing is not a math's game
                      2) such analysis is largely irrelevant, but should at least be performed by someone with a knowledge of the sweet science, and of fighters

                      there have been HUNDREDS, probably THOUSANDS of fighters with Manny's physical characteristics..... so, bollocks !!

                      there was nothing in that article that explained this.....



                      if you disagree, tell me what you saw

                      and Pac's " decline " started at the exact same time he finally agreed to drug testing

                      just like Golovkin's " decline " started at the exact same time he stepped up his competition
                      Math and physics are involved.
                      The research was written by a scientist who happens to be a boxing fan and had your su****ion too hence the research. Not sure you read it thoroughly...it's another point of view of a fan who had your same thoughts.
                      There may be millions of people with Pacquiaos bone structure..but they don't carry the same passion and intangibles as pac.( Raised in the slums, fighting for life, soldier in a war on poverty, ect.)
                      Last edited by WholeSoul75; 11-13-2018, 01:55 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP