Comments Thread For: Danny Garcia Wants Winner Of Pacquiao vs. Broner Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Motofan
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 9097
    • 603
    • 1,906
    • 28,443

    #61
    He dismantles Broner but Manny can move well enough that I still like his chances against Danny's slow ass. Broner would be target practice. Nobody who moves that poorly has any shot against Danny.

    Comment

    • CrowsNestWest
      Contender
      • Oct 2018
      • 241
      • 11
      • 35
      • 7,098

      #62
      Hope he goes back to 140 or up to 154. Pacquiao or Broner? For a regular title?

      Comment

      • Combat Talk Radio
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2015
        • 21727
        • 2,781
        • 6,368
        • 83,247

        #63
        Originally posted by Halama86
        Manny isn't the same as he used to be, but he's still very good. Since his '05 fight with Morales (if you don't count the robberies against Bradley and Horn) he's gone 23W 2L against Matthysse, Horn, Vargas, Bradley, Mayweather, Algieri, Rios, Marquez, Mosley, Margarito, Clotty, Cotto, Hatton, DeLa Hoya, Barrera, and Morales, losing only to Mayweather and Marquez (two hall of famers) , Bradley, and Horn. That's only the tail end of his career, and he never looked bad in any of those fights.

        He's not at the very top anymore, sure, but he's definitely not easy for anybody IMO.
        Had to fix that (underline) but you can't be serious with that last sentence. He looked terrible against everyone I bolded.

        Comment

        • pillowfists98
          The Takeover 2020
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2018
          • 6685
          • 148
          • 81
          • 93,444

          #64
          Not surprising. Danny has always gone after big names when they were past their primes. Nate Campbell, Erik Morales, Zab Judah, Kendall Holt. It makes his resume look a lot better than it actually is.

          Comment

          • Halama86
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Mar 2017
            • 77
            • 5
            • 46
            • 7,066

            #65
            Originally posted by revelated
            Had to fix that (underline) but you can't be serious with that last sentence. He looked terrible against everyone I bolded.
            The fix was unnecessary, as I stated earlier in the opinion that I wasn't counting those fights as losses.

            He was ahead of Marquez at the time he was KO'd. They'd both been knocked down. He had Marquez bloody.

            He legit lost to Floyd in my eyes, but I don't look at that as Manny looking like garbage but rather Floyd looking great. (I think a rematch is pointless, Floyd beats him again).

            As for Horn, I (and most pundits and viewers) had Manny winning that.

            "Terrible" is a stretch for me, but you're entitled to your opinion. I'm not a boxing expert, just a fan, so I very well could be missing things that others are seeing.

            Comment

            • Combat Talk Radio
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2015
              • 21727
              • 2,781
              • 6,368
              • 83,247

              #66
              Originally posted by Halama86
              "Terrible" is a stretch for me, but you're entitled to your opinion. I'm not a boxing expert, just a fan, so I very well could be missing things that others are seeing.
              I'ma help you out.

              Watch Pacquiao/Algieri or Pacquiao/Bradley 3.

              Then watch Pacquiao/Horn OR Mayweather/Pacquiao.

              Come back and tell me you have a much better understanding of how to identify when Pacquiao looks terrible.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP