Comments Thread For: Loeffler: Canelo Needs Golovkin More Than GGG Needs Him!

[aboutfkntime]

So Canelo, who he just fought twice, wasn't challenging? Money talks man...you know how it works, yet you choose to act like it's something different. Not sure why you're so butt hurt when it comes to ggg/aj, but it clouds your judgement. If you're just looking to argue...**** off and find someone else.😆

nope..... Canelo was a cash-out

lil'G has avoided everyone with a pulse

he killed himself to try get out of the Jacobs fight

they should have fought Cotto Saunders Derevyanchenko Charlo, and a host of others

Team Easy-Way-Out have been tip-toeing through the tulips

you know that..... so stop posturing

[aboutfkntime]

Aj vs wilder/fury winner is a fight that can be sold. It also settles who the man is in the hw division. There's the reality of who the A side is and when the fight will generate the most revenue. Both sides know these things, and when the time is right we will see the necessary concessions made in order to come to an agreement. I really don't think the split will be a major issue.

I was thinking it would be in april, but now that wilder is fighting fury with the possibility of a rematch, and Hearn is already talking about whyte, I can see it being pushed til later in the year or even beyond. Unfortunately for some fights, the "right time" becomes the time when both guys are out of options. Let's hope there is a decisive winner of the wilder/fury fight and Hearn backs off the whyte talk.

then you're a muppet

if there was a chance that fight could happen, Hearn would have offered Wilder the 35% he ADMITTED Wilder deserves

and Fury/Wilder are not talking about a rematch you posturing bltch..... I have never even heard it mentioned

[Real King Kong]

nope..... Canelo was a cash-out

lil'G has avoided everyone with a pulse

he killed himself to try get out of the Jacobs fight

they should have fought Cotto Saunders Derevyanchenko Charlo, and a host of others

Team Easy-Way-Out have been tip-toeing through the tulips

you know that..... so stop posturing

lol...cotto...yea ok. he fought Jacobs, so I'm not sure why you bring that up. who were charlo and derevyanchenko before ggg was tied up with canelo? revisionist much?

[Real King Kong]

then you're a muppet

if there was a chance that fight could happen, Hearn would have offered Wilder the 35% he ADMITTED Wilder deserves

and Fury/Wilder are not talking about a rematch you posturing bltch..... I have never even heard it mentioned

do you not know how to read? I said "possibility of a rematch", not "wilder and fury are talking about a rematch". why wouldn't there be that possibility if the fight does well and ends up close or controversial, and the winner doesn't like what's being offered by hearn?

[aboutfkntime]

lol...cotto...yea ok. he fought Jacobs, so I'm not sure why you bring that up. who were charlo and derevyanchenko before ggg was tied up with canelo? revisionist much?

they tried to move heaven and earth to kill the Jacobs fight

they put up so many roadblocks that it cost them a fight date

they lost a fight date, and only had to pay Jacobs an extra 250k lol

that was not exactly a great business decision, was it ?

they were DESPERATE to avoid that fight..... and when it happened, we saw why

FACT: Golovkin could have simply fought Derevyanchenko
FACT: Golovkin could simply fight Charlo now

keywords = " simply "

[aboutfkntime]

do you not know how to read? I said "possibility of a rematch", not "wilder and fury are talking about a rematch". why wouldn't there be that possibility if the fight does well and ends up close or controversial, and the winner doesn't like what's being offered by hearn?

then stop trying to make out like it is some roadblock

if Wilder wins, there is no rematch..... so you are talking bollocks

your " what if's " are simple stuff that effect most matchups, NOT roadblocks

[Real King Kong]

then stop trying to make out like it is some roadblock

if Wilder wins, there is no rematch..... so you are talking bollocks

your " what if's " are simple stuff that effect most matchups, NOT roadblocks

who's talking about "roadblocks"? I'm talking simple reality of the situation. I wasn't even talking to you anyway. don't respond to posts that weren't even directed at you and try to turn it into one of your ****** arguments.

[Real King Kong]

they tried to move heaven and earth to kill the Jacobs fight

they put up so many roadblocks that it cost them a fight date

they lost a fight date, and only had to pay Jacobs an extra 250k lol

that was not exactly a great business decision, was it ?

they were DESPERATE to avoid that fight..... and when it happened, we saw why

FACT: Golovkin could have simply fought Derevyanchenko
FACT: Golovkin could simply fight Charlo now

keywords = " simply "

you remind me of one of those "mayweather should have fought this guy instead" or "mayweather didn't fight that guy" type of people. ggg fought the biggest available fight at mw twice...and no doubt he's looking to do it again and probably retire. too bad for you if you don't like it...keep crying.

[aboutfkntime]

you remind me of one of those "mayweather should have fought this guy instead" or "mayweather didn't fight that guy" type of people. ggg fought the biggest available fight at mw twice...and no doubt he's looking to do it again and probably retire. too bad for you if you don't like it...keep crying.

go and slap yourself for mentioning Mayweather and Hypekin in the same sentence

Mayweather was all about reward, which is why he fought everybody..... Golovkin is all about risk, which is why he fought nobody

you remind me of those guys who know that Golovkin ducked Ward, but try to pretend that it never happened

[aboutfkntime]

who's talking about "roadblocks"? I'm talking simple reality of the situation. I wasn't even talking to you anyway. don't respond to posts that weren't even directed at you and try to turn it into one of your ****** arguments.

stop posturing