Comments Thread For: Hearn: How Can Mayweather Hold Back Davis From Making More Money?

[cally93]

Actually this deal saves me a lot of $$$$. I spend close to $200 on PPV fights. Im cool with $10 a month. And if nothing on then skip a month or 2

Absolutely bro, it’s meant to be like Netflix in the sense you can cancel/rejoin whenever you want, so no ones tied into any long contracts.

[Outwest Exp 355]

If he wins... He's on the platform that holds all champions Including the Biggest payday of them all in Canelo.

You think every single person in the world roots for Canelo if he fights Jacobs in may? Or you think a sizeable chunk of fans will root for Jacobs due to golovkin loss and the PED storm?

Jacobs' profile will be doing just fine by the end of the second quarter

You really think Oscar is gonna put Canelo in the ring with Jacobs because I don’t?

[yammy25]

You really think Oscar is gonna put Canelo in the ring with Jacobs because I don’t?

Who are we to know what Oscar puts in any ring... He's full of surprises

[N/A]

Lie Hearn didn't know Finkel and Warren was working together.

How the **** would you know what Hearn knew? Finkel admitted publicly during negotiations he was seeking a bid from BT/Warren and if Sky matched it, they could have the fight. Only months later did Hearn try to act like the BT bid was a stumbling block.

[Outwest Exp 355]

Who are we to know what Oscar puts in any ring... He's full of surprises

Just my opinion no need to cry about it.

[yammy25]

Just my opinion no need to cry about it.

It was a joke about him shoving things in his rectum...

Subtle humour really is lost on most non-brits.

[Jax teller]

How the **** would you know what Hearn knew? Finkel admitted publicly during negotiations he was seeking a bid from BT/Warren and if Sky matched it, they could have the fight. Only months later did Hearn try to act like the BT bid was a stumbling block.

So your telling me about Finkel and Warrens conversations, WBA conspiracies, AJ's earning and Wilders earning and Hearns intentions of not fighting Wilder next but you can't comprehend that Hearn would have used it as a get out of jail free card if had known, **** off.

Also you said Finkel was just seeking advice about how much these fights go for PPV wise, what would Warren/BT know more than anyone else their first PPV was the Canelo GGG rematch?

Warrens only involvement at the time was he said something along the lines of he had seen the deal through a mutual lawyer, that was it. Then he made up something about 30 mil rematch whereas Finkel said there was no rematch (check ESPN).

[ChrisCook]

I’m assuming roughly the same way Hearn held AJ from a 50 mil guarantee

Let's not let the facts get in the way of a good story eh?

[N/A]

So your telling me about Finkel and Warrens conversations, WBA conspiracies, AJ's earning and Wilders earning and Hearns intentions of not fighting Wilder next but you can't comprehend that Hearn would have used it as a get out of jail free card if had known, **** off.

I can tell you about all sorts of stuff, but if you're going to be a rude *******, there's really no reason for us to speak. If you're not interested in insight into how boxing negotiations really work and just want to be a jerk, there are plenty of other posters you can interact with instead.

Also you said Finkel was just seeking advice about how much these fights go for PPV wise, what would Warren/BT know more than anyone else their first PPV was the Canelo GGG rematch?

In Hearn's offer to Wilder, Hearn would have completely controlled the promotion and been allowed to sell the rights to any broadcaster in any territory, including Wilder's territory. I.E. By accepting the fight, Wilder would have to be willing to fight on DAZN.

In Wilder's offer to Joshua, Wilder would have controlled the promotion and the fight would have been on SHOWTIME PPV. Obviously Joshua's Sky commitments would make things tricky in the UK, so Finkel said the UK rights could go to Sky as long as they matched BT's offer. Whereas in Hearn's offer, the US rights could go to DAZN even if Showtime was willing to match. So Wilder's offer was far more fair in that sense, that he wasn't trying to force AJ off his home broadcaster as long as they paid market value, whereas Hearn was trying to force Wilder off his broadcaster, even though they were willing to pay market value.

Warrens only involvement at the time was he said something along the lines of he had seen the deal through a mutual lawyer, that was it. Then he made up something about 30 mil rematch whereas Finkel said there was no rematch (check ESPN).

Warren's involvement was to determine what the UK rights were worth, so Wilder's team would know if Sky was being fair.

Wilder's initial offer was a one fight deal, no rematches for anyone. A later offer did include a $30 million guarantee for a rematch in the UK if Joshua lost the first fight.

[Jax teller]

I can tell you about all sorts of stuff, but if you're going to be a rude *******, there's really no reason for us to speak. If you're not interested in insight into how boxing negotiations really work and just want to be a jerk, there are plenty of other posters you can interact with instead.




In Hearn's offer to Wilder, Hearn would have completely controlled the promotion and been allowed to sell the rights to any broadcaster in any territory, including Wilder's territory. I.E. By accepting the fight, Wilder would have to be willing to fight on DAZN.

In Wilder's offer to Joshua, Wilder would have controlled the promotion and the fight would have been on SHOWTIME PPV. Obviously Joshua's Sky commitments would make things tricky in the UK, so Finkel said the UK rights could go to Sky as long as they matched BT's offer. Whereas in Hearn's offer, the US rights could go to DAZN even if Showtime was willing to match. So Wilder's offer was far more fair in that sense, that he wasn't trying to force AJ off his home broadcaster as long as they paid market value, whereas Hearn was trying to force Wilder off his broadcaster, even though they were willing to pay market value.




Warren's involvement was to determine what the UK rights were worth, so Wilder's team would know if Sky was being fair.

Wilder's initial offer was a one fight deal, no rematches for anyone. A later offer did include a $30 million guarantee for a rematch in the UK if Joshua lost the first fight.

The rematch was only spoke about by Warren, therefore as you would say "logically" it is untrue.

You can twist it and make up conversations/theories all you like at the end of the day you have provided no evidence to prove what you are saying and only prove your points with theories. I have given you examples of people lying and all you have done is warp time lines and again make up theories.

You are not worth talking to and have little to teach in regards to AJ Wilder as you are unwilling to agree in anyway that Wilder or his team have shown any unfavorable behavior towards the fight as you are so agenda driven you cannot comprehend it takes two to tango.