Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Erupts: Wilder Wants 60-40 For Joshua? F*** Off!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
    I guess he didn't know anything about market value when he managed Klitschko v Joshua on Sky PPV, huh?

    Stop talking ****.
    Sky made the best offer for that fight.

    But why should Wilder's team pay 50 million for AJ and then be forced to sell the fight to Sky for under market value? Why incentive does Sky have to pay top dollar for the fight is they're guaranteed the fight regardless of what they pay? Of course Finkel has to go to Warren and see what the fight is worth to BT.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
      Stop lying about what I believe. I've never said AJ's purse is wildly inflated. It's likely inflated, but how much so is anybody's guess.

      You tell me what AJ's filed purse is. You're the one trying to use Wilder's filed purse. So you're the one being inconsistent. I'm the one looking at the revenue and going with what's likely. Wilder likely makes 4-5 million per fight. AJ likely makes 16-20 million per fight.
      How come you are the only person on this platform that always say wilder makes 4/5mil per fight.

      Am suspecting you must be his promoter or his account manager.

      Every other person knows that his best pay is 2.1mil.

      Can you sell your BS to someone else?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
        IBO just takes Boxrec's ratings and removes the champions.

        I'm not criticizing the IBO, I'm simply pointing out that it's not a recognized world championship. You're only trying to pretend it's a world title because they give AJ their belt for free.

        I'm always advocating for Boxrec ratings, but the IBO ruins the Boxrec ratings by taking the champions out.
        The champion makes the belt and a worthy champion is carrying it so it's highly recognised at least at HW level.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
          Every other person knows that his best pay is 2.1mil.
          Wilder's filed purse for his most recent fight was 2.1 million. Crawford's filed purse for his most recent fight was 2 million.

          But Crawford's actual purse was a guaranteed minimum of 3.625 million.

          Why do you believe that Wilder's filed purse is accurate when it's been so common for 70 years for US stars to file bogus purses?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
            The champion makes the belt and a worthy champion is carrying it so it's highly recognised at least at HW level.
            Empty rhetoric. Boxing has four recognized world titles and the IBO isn't one of them. Sorry. Nobody considers the IBO a world title other than AJ fans that have been brainwashed.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
              Empty rhetoric. Boxing has four recognized world titles and the IBO isn't one of them. Sorry. Nobody considers the IBO a world title other than AJ fans that have been brainwashed.


              good to hear you acknowledge that

              Comment


              • It's actually irrelevant how much Wilder has earned from a single fight to date. Fact is, this is a hugely anticipated showdown because of BOTH Joshua and Wilder. It's a collision between unbeaten belt-holders and Wilder should get what he's due. 55-45 Joshua is fair, 60-40 is unfair if Wilder is coming off a big win over Fury. Let's face it, a win over Fury trumps anything Joshua has achieved to this point. (Best win is an inactive, coming-off-a-loss Klitschko, who was 41 years old.)

                If Wilder devastatingly knocks out Fury and the fight does good business, he deserves 50-50 because that win will get even more buys for AJ-Wilder. AJ hasn't had a flashy exciting win for a while now.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                  They were able to sign before there was a date & venue because both fighters agreed the fight would be next and would take place in November or December.

                  AJ and Wilder weren't able to sign before there was a date & venue because Hearn refused to guarantee the fight would be next and that the fight would take place this year.

                  That's the difference.

                  Show me where he refused, omission is not refusal, Wilder simply stated there wasn't a date so that was a possibility after time ran out not before to get the deal done. Finkel lied about knowing the date and venue in the run up to the signing.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Kilrain View Post
                    Let's face it, a win over Fury trumps anything Joshua has achieved to this point. (Best win is an inactive, coming-off-a-loss Klitschko, who was 41 years old.)

                    If Wilder devastatingly knocks out Fury and the fight does good business, he deserves 50-50 because that win will get even more buys for AJ-Wilder. AJ hasn't had a flashy exciting win for a while now.

                    Please please please take your Wilder goggles off here.

                    How are you going to discredit Joshua's win over Wlad by saying he's 41. And then big up Tyson Fury after he was out for 3 years, put on 120lbs through drink, drugs and mental problems and then faced the second best cruiserweight in Albania and then a guy ranked 137th in the world?!

                    And you don't think AJ stopping the previously unstopped Povetkin is exciting? What ****ing planet are you on?

                    Wilder does not deserve 50/50 unless he proves he can draw as much money as Joshua can on his own.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                      Wilder's filed purse for his most recent fight was 2.1 million. Crawford's filed purse for his most recent fight was 2 million.

                      But Crawford's actual purse was a guaranteed minimum of 3.625 million.

                      Why do you believe that Wilder's filed purse is accurate when it's been so common for 70 years for US stars to file bogus purses?
                      Thats not what the official purse and garanteed purse is about. They'd be pretty dumb if it was was posting it on social media think about it. Loop holes would have been shut by sanctioning bodies ages ago and the only proof you have of bogus purses declares it as fraud in the article, we discussed this.

                      Also why wouldnt AJ be doing this? You keep saying he overstates his income instead, is it because you're bias and a liar?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP