Why not eliminate the 168 and 154 divisions

**N/A** · 10-21-2018, 01:27 AM

Originally posted by JasonBoxing

?
Eadybdjdjdjdj

Because networks want world title fights.

**kidbazooka** · 10-21-2018, 01:35 AM

Originally posted by JasonBoxing

?
Eadybdjdjdjdj

You literally just typed in bs because message was too short.

Boxing is not for you.

**TexDeuce** · 10-21-2018, 02:54 AM

Boxing needs to eliminate a few weight classes and a few belts.

**BLASTER1** · 10-21-2018, 03:15 AM

[QUOTE=JasonBoxing;19211762]?
Eadybdjdjdjdj[/Q

So your saying go from 147-160
160-175?
That's a big weight difference.

**Tony Trick-Pony** · 10-21-2018, 03:22 AM

There are definitely too many weight classes. I think 160 is rarely good anymore because of so many at 154 or 168. If those were gone, guys would either go to 160 or 175 and the other guys would be at 147 or 160. Most divisions are weaker because the talent is so spread out, especially in the lower weight classes. That shlt is ridiculous.

**tonysoprano** · 10-21-2018, 05:18 AM

I'd be in favour of this. Would cut down on the weight bullying as well. Will never happen though.

**killakali** · 10-21-2018, 05:46 AM

Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF

Because networks want world title fights.

the homie WBC WBA IBA checking in. Educating these fools. DAZN up in this. Everyone know they gonna run Boxing.

Just wait till GGG Brant and Canelo Bear Charlo.

**A.K** · 10-21-2018, 05:52 AM

Why not eliminate all the divisions and just have open weight I know everyone wants to see Lomachenko vs Ward

**Zaryu** · 10-21-2018, 06:20 AM

They're both necessary weight classes based on the size differences between the people in them in comparison to those just above or below a weight class.

Why not eliminate the 168 and 154 divisions