The best part is that Canelo still beat GGG when testing restarted at an astonishing 120 days before the fight even though Canelo submitted to 365 OST for the first time. Assuming Canelo “cheated” he never performed while on something. That’s why the boxing gods have him P4P #1. Best part is WADA worldwide acknowledges Clen for a threshold that proves Canelo never took advantage for any PED theoryz
GGG-Canelo II - Press Row Scoring - Don't Delete this Again Canelo Fan Boys
Collapse
-
-
You’re right! Moretti was off a couple rounds in the 2nd fight too. Canelo murked GGG in the rematch. Most boxing fans talk about that fight the most too cause Canelo was a badassComment
-
Go check this thread he's been mentioned numerous times.
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...hlight=moretti
Or you want to say that GGG performed like Paul Williams when he beat Lara? Maybe this card better suits your GGG vs Canelo narrative
Williams threw over 1,000 punches over the 12 rounds, but only had a contact percentage of 19 percent, whereas Lara's percentage was over 40.Comment
-
GGG won the first fight and didn’t get the credit
Simple , non toxic and self efficient
But , imo , Canelo won the second fight very decisively
And honestly speaking , there really is no fughin need for a third instalment especially the way GGG is ageing
This thought coming from watching his last few fights
I’d like to see anyone wager BIG money on GGG in the trilogy , unless they know something or have something in the bagComment
-
Bad scoring is wide scoring on TWO cards or all cards.
Or you want to say that GGG performed like Paul Williams when he beat Lara? Maybe this card better suits your GGG vs Canelo narrative
Williams threw over 1,000 punches over the 12 rounds, but only had a contact percentage of 19 percent, whereas Lara's percentage was over 40.Comment
-
exactly that’s why there’s three judges for margin of error, and the fact that “swing rounds” is an actual term in boxing. And again, “bad scoring” or robberies are when all judges score the fight contrary...Comment
-
I think there is a bit of confusion between us. I will be a bit clearer. Bad scoring is when a judge scores a fight contrary to what transpired in the ring either in conjunction with the other judges or apart from them.Comment
-
And that’s when YOU as a fan have the luxury to break down the rounds and detail what each fighter didComment
Comment