Comments Thread For: Crawford vs. Spence - CompuBox Head To Head Analysis
Collapse
-
-
I think that is a myth. Brook is a sharp shooter so he would land nice shots in spots, but you could make a case for him landing more clean shots in three or four rounds vs GGG than he did in 11 rounds against Spence. But I think the point you are making is Spence took the shots well and you would be correct.Comment
-
Spence will run into counters all night. He can only fight one way. This isn't a weight drained Brook he'll be fighting.Comment
-
Try to keep up.Comment
-
You said "ive never seen Spence hit that clean". Anyway when there is a matchup between skill and power I always go with skill. Crawford has many more dimensions to his game than Spence does.Comment
-
Especially from 5:20 on.. the movement and variation of Punches Spence was showing.Last edited by CLUE; 10-16-2018, 02:46 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
I think activity level is bankable when there are two guys who are equally talented but one has a true size/power advantage and is the more active guy. (Its a little more nuanced than that but that's basically what it comes down to.)
When I see that I know where to bet...I've bet on Hurd v. Lara and Loma v. Rigo for this same reason
NOBODY needed to use compu-trash to know that Hurd was more active than Lara, and Loma was more active than RigoComment
-
they all said that Golovkin would walk through Canelo
I said that Golovkin will keep them hands at home when he realizes how sharp Canelo is
the same thing will happen to Spence
I definitely expect his output to drop with Crawford
NOT saying that Crawford will win..... saying that those compu-stats will be meaningless when those guys get in the ring
it will come down to how their styles meshComment
Comment