At this stage, I don't think its important to rehash the scoring or anything as that's been beaten to death. Fair to say a bunch of people agree with you and a bunch don't, and leave it at that.
What is for sure is that there were two excellent, close. competitive fights where they both showed themselves to be equals. With different judges the GGG crowd would be claiming proof and validation that GGG was better, and I don't think that would be accurate either.
For me they are each other's nemesis - two elite fighters who are equals and have yet to demonstrate who is clearly the better. Any other conclusion is bias (in my book).
Triple L fans can't take the L so let Jermall Charlo vs golovkin settle it! LMMFAO!
Couldn’t have said it better myself with the exception I thought CGennady won the second fight
But you summed it up perfectly Sauliman is all about the $. Canelo treated their belt and organization like a piece of trash dropping the strap and wouldn’t even fight for it or pay the sanctioning fee against Cotto . Then Sauliman had Gennadys back because he was a high profile fighter that brought in good sanctioning fees
Canelo .... cough .... cough wins the rematch and Sauliman cant get on Canelos d.ick fast enough because he’s the younger guy and brings in more $ and will defend him with no shame
You’re right the sport is a f.ucking joke and honestly it always has been it’s rarely fought on a level playing field especially if there’s a A-side $ maker involved
And while it lines the pocket for the people involved in the sport who follow the $, it does a disservice to the fans and that’s why many get turned off of the sport.
Say what you will about Sulaiman and the organization's bogusness but can't really disagree about canelo, I mean, who really thinks GGG will win fight 3?
It’s not about who won the problem is this dude showing bias with his nationalism. When he’s suppose to be non bias.
Tweet
Comment