Comments Thread For: This Bud's For You, Crawford's Stock Continues To Rise

[TJ highway]

u thought Crawford was gonna losencuz he lost 2 of 11 rounds. These *****Z be high af lmao

LOL! True boxing fan had Bud winning the fight. He did not need the TKO but it came any way!

The test of a fighter is having to go the distance!

[PunchyPotorff]

How does it rise after a bad performance where he looked like he was going to lose to Mauricio Herrera's previously vanquished opponent before Benavidez's bad knee gave out, and then it still took Crawford until the 12th round to get rid of a sitting duck?
I swear, it's like some of these writers are literally being paid by the promoters. I'm not saying that's a fact or that I have any evidence of it, just that from the content of their articles, it really seems that way from my perspective.

Translation: Along with glenn mcrory, I lost a shiiiii-load stiff bet on this fight, and FNO I will never stop whining.

LOL!!!

[Ake-Dawg]

The writing was a tad flowery, with some hyperbole, but definitely accurate. Crawford was rather clinical. He looked for the KO but only if it was there without risk. He showed great body work and pretty good defense against a long guy with a good jab.

I guess for some, you're only good if you can KO a guy who doesn't want to be KO'd. For those same guys, the underdog is winning rounds that he's not landing any real blows in. Learn to appreciate different tactics to winning a fight.

Someone said it looked like Crawford was going to lose! When? These same supposed boxing experts with their lack of logic seemingly don't see a fight plan unfolding?

[aboutfkntime]

How does it rise after a bad performance where he looked like he was going to lose to Mauricio Herrera's previously vanquished opponent before Benavidez's bad knee gave out, and then it still took Crawford until the 12th round to get rid of a sitting duck?

I swear, it's like some of these writers are literally being paid by the promoters. I'm not saying that's a fact or that I have any evidence of it, just that from the content of their articles, it really seems that way from my perspective.

[Redd Foxx]

How does it rise after a bad performance where he looked like he was going to lose to Mauricio Herrera's previously vanquished opponent before Benavidez's bad knee gave out, and then it still took Crawford until the 12th round to get rid of a sitting duck?

I swear, it's like some of these writers are literally being paid by the promoters. I'm not saying that's a fact or that I have any evidence of it, just that from the content of their articles, it really seems that way from my perspective.

Idiots like you are why this forum is in the trash state that it's in.
Crawford put on a great performance against a rugged, undefeated young fighter who came in much bigger than himself. It's was a gritty and massively entertaining fight that drew a lot of viewers and ended in a KO.

But, this place is populated with trash mu***ers that don't care about boxing, you're all just cheerleaders for certain guys and spend all day trying to bash the others, all the while exposing your ignorance the whole time.

I'm not going to get into a debate with you so go ahead and get in your response. I won't be back to read it because nothing you say will change the fact that you're a forum troll who has little interest in real boxing.

[Drigo]

Crab mentality attack here. We got to give Bud credit as he beat and stop a previously undefeated fighter. Good performance though.but the bud need more hurdle to overcome to be the best...

[Raggamuffin]

u thought Crawford was gonna losencuz he lost 2 of 11 rounds. These *****Z be high af lmao

Hahahahahahahaha...

[Zodogg]

Bunch of haters guys who don't know **** boxing on this site they think every fight is going to be so easy for a top rated guy..Crawford was methodical and showed a lot of skill in breaking down his opponent who was rough rugged and tough. Nobody goes in and just blows out top 10 guys

[P4Pdunny]

How does it rise after a bad performance where he looked like he was going to lose to Mauricio Herrera's previously vanquished opponent before Benavidez's bad knee gave out, and then it still took Crawford until the 12th round to get rid of a sitting duck?

I swear, it's like some of these writers are literally being paid by the promoters. I'm not saying that's a fact or that I have any evidence of it, just that from the content of their articles, it really seems that way from my perspective.

Talk me through, at what stage did it look like Crawford was going to lose?

[P4Pdunny]

u thought Crawford was gonna losencuz he lost 2 of 11 rounds. These *****Z be high af lmao

lmao some of the stuff people post on here...they gotta be trollin