Just checked out the whole list. If I could pick 5 to get in they'd be Ivan Calderon, Rafael Marquez, Michael Moorer, Genaro Hernandez, and Wilfredo Vasquez.
Julian Jackson beat Norris and won 3 belts over two classes in a crazy deep era. That gets him in imo.
I'd put Hernandez on too.
Side note: Gatti got in so in reality all of these guys listed should get in too because he wasn't even remotely close to being on any of their levels.
He got in because of white guy/east coast bias. He was barely above a club level guy but had a big east coast reputation. He was never a household name nationally. Just to white guys on the east coast.
That is a list of the top contenders for a title shot and not a pound for pound best list. They are two entirely different things. The top 50 pfp list would include all top boxers from all weight classes and not just one weight class. Ring is rating those cruiserweights by who they have actually defeated to earn a title shot. PFP isn't resume it's potential and how good you THINK a boxer is for his weight.
Ok so America dominates, as long as you only look at P4P lists within certain parameters.
10. Constantin Bejenaru
COUNTRY: MOLDOVA
13-0-0 (3 KOS)
WEEKS ON LIST: 11
lmao, you hand picked cruiserweight. Its a poverty division. Thats why its all 3rd world **** holes.
Also Did I not say p4p rankings? You said "Cruiserweight p4p rankings" That doesnt even make any ***ing sense. Did you just start watching boxing yesterday?
Um, not sure if you were aware, but the U.S. is the home of boxing; always has been. If you're going to fight your entire career somewhere and be a credible star you fight in the U.S., not Germany. That's not being biased or ethnocentric in any way. It's just a fact.
I think both Julian Jackson and Dariusz Michalczewski belong. Jackson lost to McCallum early in his career, but not again until the end of his career to McClellan. In between he was dominant against some pretty good competition. And his power was chilling. As for Michalczewski, he was very strong, durable and well conditioned. Roy Jones ducked him for a reason.
So when cotto stepped up and got whooped by mayweathwr pacquiao canelo trout and margarito this site was making him out to be some sort of legend when he retired 'he only lost to the best' but when Hatton lost to pacquiao and mayweather 'no hall of famer, he lost when he stepped up' I'm sick of the racism towards European fighters on here who seem to have to do twice as much as everyone else. If u don't want Hatton in there fine, but don't put cotto in there
Posted by the most racist poster on NSB. Who was Hattons best win? A win over Kostya Tszu isn't enough to make a HOF career.
So when cotto stepped up and got whooped by mayweathwr pacquiao canelo trout and margarito this site was making him out to be some sort of legend when he retired 'he only lost to the best' but when Hatton lost to pacquiao and mayweather 'no hall of famer, he lost when he stepped up' I'm sick of the racism towards European fighters on here who seem to have to do twice as much as everyone else. If u don't want Hatton in there fine, but don't put cotto in there
Cotto won world titles from 140-160...He fought EVERYONE relevant in his era...He fought Margarito TWICE...even after getting beat with plaster he STILL fought him....he had every right to turn down the rematch but he still took it...Hatton NEVER fought Witter...why?...Hatton claims Witter bad mouthed him and was being verbally disrespectful lol...see the difference between Cotto and Hatton yet?!?...not to mention Cotto accomplished more and was a better fighter than Hatton
Comment