Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: 50-50 Whether Saunders Gets License For Andrade Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Hearn: 50-50 Whether Saunders Gets License For Andrade Fight

    Eddie Hearn isn’t quite sure what to expect Tuesday. Demetrius Andrade’s promoter thinks it’s a “50-50” proposition as to whether the Massachusetts State Athletic Commission will license Billy Joe Saunders for his upcoming WBO middleweight title defense against Andrade. The Massachusetts commission will rule on Saunders’ license application during a meeting Tuesday afternoon.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Old article.. BJS has already been proven clean by VADA B sample. The commission has to licence him they have no reason not too.

    Comment


    • #3
      If this cheating POS gets licensed I don’t wanna hear anyone talk about Canelo having favoritism.

      This guy is clearly a PED user yet their not sure whether to license lol hmmmmm wonder why.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by kidbazooka View Post
        If this cheating POS gets licensed I dont wanna hear anyone talk about Canelo having favoritism.

        This guy is clearly a PED user yet their not sure whether to license lol hmmmmm wonder why.
        VADA already tested B sample and proven he is clean

        Comment


        • #5
          i thought he was already licensed clean?

          Comment


          • #6
            Strange timing considering it came out yesterday his B sample was clean.

            Comment


            • #7
              For the integrity and image of the sport, the MSAC Massachusetts State Athletic Commission and VADA the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency should ban Billy Joe Saunders for this improper type of conduct. He knew fully well in advance what he was taking and why he was taking it for.

              They suspended Canelo Alvarez for doping so how is Billy Joe Saunders is any different? If he gets a license to fight then it sends a bad message that bad behavior is rewarded with good. Then if that is the case, it isn't fair to ban, suspend or fine other PED users for the doing the exact same thing.

              Every time these guys get popped the always come with a convenient excuse. They didn't know or it was an accident.

              In the end BJS signed up for VADA so he is subject to their rules and regulations. VADA's protocol takes precedence over UKAD and the BBBoC.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kidbazooka View Post
                If this cheating POS gets licensed I dont wanna hear anyone talk about Canelo having favoritism.

                This guy is clearly a PED user yet their not sure whether to license lol hmmmmm wonder why.
                Saunders:
                Sample A: positive
                Sample B: negative

                Canelo:
                Sample A: positive
                Sample B: positive

                Hmmmmmmmm I wonder wheres the difference

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
                  For the integrity and image of the sport, the MSAC Massachusetts State Athletic Commission and VADA the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency should ban Billy Joe Saunders for this improper type of conduct. He knew fully well in advance what he was taking and why he was taking it for.

                  They suspended Canelo Alvarez for doping so how is Billy Joe Saunders is any different? If he gets a license to fight then it sends a bad message that bad behavior is rewarded with good. Then if that is the case, it isn't fair to ban, suspend or fine other PED users for the doing the exact same thing.

                  Every time these guys get popped the always come with a convenient excuse. They didn't know or it was an accident.

                  In the end BJS signed up for VADA so he is subject to their rules and regulations. VADA's protocol takes precedence over UKAD and the BBBoC.
                  According to VADA, B sample was confirmed clean. Theres the difference.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by fernandtg View Post
                    According to VADA, B sample was confirmed clean. Theres the difference.
                    Where's your source?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP