Comments Thread For: Hearn: 50-50 Whether Saunders Gets License For Andrade Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Hearn: 50-50 Whether Saunders Gets License For Andrade Fight

    Eddie Hearn isn’t quite sure what to expect Tuesday. Demetrius Andrade’s promoter thinks it’s a “50-50” proposition as to whether the Massachusetts State Athletic Commission will license Billy Joe Saunders for his upcoming WBO middleweight title defense against Andrade. The Massachusetts commission will rule on Saunders’ license application during a meeting Tuesday afternoon.

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • NahMean
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2017
    • 2870
    • 153
    • 0
    • 82,973

    #2
    Old article.. BJS has already been proven clean by VADA B sample. The commission has to licence him they have no reason not too.

    Comment

    • kidbazooka
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2015
      • 10062
      • 278
      • 2
      • 133,405

      #3
      If this cheating POS gets licensed I don’t wanna hear anyone talk about Canelo having favoritism.

      This guy is clearly a PED user yet their not sure whether to license lol hmmmmm wonder why.

      Comment

      • NahMean
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2017
        • 2870
        • 153
        • 0
        • 82,973

        #4
        Originally posted by kidbazooka
        If this cheating POS gets licensed I dont wanna hear anyone talk about Canelo having favoritism.

        This guy is clearly a PED user yet their not sure whether to license lol hmmmmm wonder why.
        VADA already tested B sample and proven he is clean

        Comment

        • P4Pdunny
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 8096
          • 143
          • 142
          • 58,715

          #5
          i thought he was already licensed clean?

          Comment

          • Vinnykin
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2016
            • 5150
            • 200
            • 118
            • 78,217

            #6
            Strange timing considering it came out yesterday his B sample was clean.

            Comment

            • champion4ever
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 23723
              • 4,031
              • 6,986
              • 202,915,785

              #7
              For the integrity and image of the sport, the MSAC Massachusetts State Athletic Commission and VADA the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency should ban Billy Joe Saunders for this improper type of conduct. He knew fully well in advance what he was taking and why he was taking it for.

              They suspended Canelo Alvarez for doping so how is Billy Joe Saunders is any different? If he gets a license to fight then it sends a bad message that bad behavior is rewarded with good. Then if that is the case, it isn't fair to ban, suspend or fine other PED users for the doing the exact same thing.

              Every time these guys get popped the always come with a convenient excuse. They didn't know or it was an accident.

              In the end BJS signed up for VADA so he is subject to their rules and regulations. VADA's protocol takes precedence over UKAD and the BBBoC.

              Comment

              • fernandtg
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jul 2016
                • 533
                • 38
                • 18
                • 16,076

                #8
                Originally posted by kidbazooka
                If this cheating POS gets licensed I dont wanna hear anyone talk about Canelo having favoritism.

                This guy is clearly a PED user yet their not sure whether to license lol hmmmmm wonder why.
                Saunders:
                Sample A: positive
                Sample B: negative

                Canelo:
                Sample A: positive
                Sample B: positive

                Hmmmmmmmm I wonder wheres the difference

                Comment

                • fernandtg
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jul 2016
                  • 533
                  • 38
                  • 18
                  • 16,076

                  #9
                  Originally posted by champion4ever
                  For the integrity and image of the sport, the MSAC Massachusetts State Athletic Commission and VADA the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency should ban Billy Joe Saunders for this improper type of conduct. He knew fully well in advance what he was taking and why he was taking it for.

                  They suspended Canelo Alvarez for doping so how is Billy Joe Saunders is any different? If he gets a license to fight then it sends a bad message that bad behavior is rewarded with good. Then if that is the case, it isn't fair to ban, suspend or fine other PED users for the doing the exact same thing.

                  Every time these guys get popped the always come with a convenient excuse. They didn't know or it was an accident.

                  In the end BJS signed up for VADA so he is subject to their rules and regulations. VADA's protocol takes precedence over UKAD and the BBBoC.
                  According to VADA, B sample was confirmed clean. Theres the difference.

                  Comment

                  • champion4ever
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 23723
                    • 4,031
                    • 6,986
                    • 202,915,785

                    #10
                    Originally posted by fernandtg
                    According to VADA, B sample was confirmed clean. Theres the difference.
                    Where's your source?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP