Tweet
I have a little experience in contracts as I have to deal with them hiring a secretary just to keep up the hectic work at Mayfield. Anyway ive been reading up on the subject ,I believe when you agree to a contract that is presented and fulfill all legal terms discussed ,it is the other party that is obligated to sign what is agreed upon.
Of course it is now new negotiations planning and one has to decide if he wants to sign something he feels hes more entitled to. This would be wilder who is in a complacement stance,he needs to think for himself and leave the other members of his team out of it based on what he wishes to gain not them. I think this will all depend on the fury outcome.
I myself see Hearn in the right here even if it was a stalled tactic because in the real business world you take whats offered if more is there to gain and tomorrow is not guaranteed.
Of course it is now new negotiations planning and one has to decide if he wants to sign something he feels hes more entitled to. This would be wilder who is in a complacement stance,he needs to think for himself and leave the other members of his team out of it based on what he wishes to gain not them. I think this will all depend on the fury outcome.
I myself see Hearn in the right here even if it was a stalled tactic because in the real business world you take whats offered if more is there to gain and tomorrow is not guaranteed.
Comment