Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Fielding: DAZN Definitely in The Running, Says Hearn

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Madison Boxing
    The Immortal
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35399
    • 6,450
    • 3,352
    • 190,590

    #61
    [/I]
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
    He's the WBA world champion. You're free to value that as much or as little as you wish. He is a champion just as much as the winner of the Super Bowl is a champion and the winner of the local 1st grade spelling bee is a champion. The public decides which championships are worthy of attention.
    He's no champion

    Comment

    • Kezzer
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2017
      • 3480
      • 116
      • 35
      • 58,969

      #62
      Originally posted by rolshans
      And then they put Fielding at 1 to 10? These oddsmakers really taking those margins.
      Yeah I thought that. I think it’s because there probably is not much more temptation to put a bet on something 10:1 as 20:1 for example when it’s 50/50.

      I’m acually quite looking forward to this matchup; hoping the undercard is decent.

      Comment

      • Jubei
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 6678
        • 457
        • 286
        • 56,728

        #63
        LOL 33:1 fight, and there are still Canelo arselickers who defend this utter trash.

        GGG only fought Vanes who is much better than Fielding because Canelo failed a PED test, while Canelo himself picks Fielding for his next fight and some mongs defend this utter trash.

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #64
          Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff
          That's semantics.

          What's the point of the WBA having a "World Champion" when
          they also have a "Super Champion" who is ranked higher?
          The point is to make more money in sanctioning fees. Personally, I stopped recognizing the WBA in 2001 when they introduced the super title. I suggest everyone else do the same.

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #65
            Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff
            None of the organizations call it a 'regular' world title,
            but you know full well that each organization can have
            multiple 'World Champions' in each division.
            "Silver Champions", "Super Champions", interim Champions,
            and even "Champions in recess".
            I wish that was just something made up by fans.
            Silver champions aren't world champions. They're silver champions. Interim world champions aren't world champions, they're interim champions. Champions in recess aren't world champions, they're champions in recess.

            Super champions aren't world champions, they're super champions. World champions aren't regular champions. They're world champions.

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47366
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #66
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              Silver champions aren't world champions. They're silver champions. Interim world champions aren't world champions, they're interim champions. Champions in recess aren't world champions, they're champions in recess.

              Super champions aren't world champions, they're super champions. World champions aren't regular champions. They're world champions.


              the highest ranking champion is acceptable

              the rest are just silly bullshlt.....

              silly bullshlt that was inspired by greed and justified by ******ity

              Comment

              • Lemonhead_Jeff
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2013
                • 1636
                • 113
                • 17
                • 18,096

                #67
                Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                Silver champions aren't world champions. They're silver champions. Interim world champions aren't world champions, they're interim champions. Champions in recess aren't world champions, they're champions in recess.

                Super champions aren't world champions, they're super champions. World champions aren't regular champions. They're world champions.
                According to Wikipedia:

                "The WBC has also created a "Silver" world title in 2010."

                "The Silver title was created as a replacement to the interim title. But unlike its predecessor, a boxer holding the Silver title cannot inherit the full title vacated by the champion. The WBC continues to recognize Interim and Silver champions, as well as Interim Silver champions."

                "The WBA recognises the title holders from the WBC, WBO, and IBF organisations. The WBA refers to a champion who holds two or more of these titles in the same weight class as a 'Super Champion'"

                "If a fighter with multiple titles also holds the WBA's title, the fighter is promoted to 'Super Champion' and the WBA title—which is then referred to as the "Regular" title—becomes vacant for competition by other WBA-ranked boxers. As a result, the WBA's official list of champions will often show a 'WBA Super World Champion' and a 'WBA World Champion' for the same weight class"

                Interpret that how ever you like.

                Comment

                • Lemonhead_Jeff
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 1636
                  • 113
                  • 17
                  • 18,096

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Jubei
                  LOL 33:1 fight, and there are still Canelo arselickers who defend this utter trash.

                  GGG only fought Vanes who is much better than Fielding because Canelo failed a PED test, while Canelo himself picks Fielding for his next fight and some mongs defend this utter trash.
                  Golovkin chose a smaller man in Vanes, who was already
                  mentally retired. Vanes was not only coming-up from 154,
                  he had not fought in two years.
                  Fielding is a larger man than Canelo, and he is a current
                  world titlist who is at or close-to his prime.
                  Don't twist the facts to suit your own biased narrative.

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff
                    According to Wikipedia:

                    "The WBC has also created a "Silver" world title in 2010."
                    Well wikipedia is wrong. It's not a world title. It's a silver title.

                    Comment

                    • N/A
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 9269
                      • 214
                      • 0
                      • 12

                      #70
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                      the highest ranking champion is acceptable

                      the rest are just silly bullshlt.....
                      World is world. Super is super. The super title isn't a world title. The world title is meaningless because it's not the highest in the WBA. So you shouldn't recognized either. De-recognize the WBA until the world title is the top title again.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP