Whether it was great or not the fact is Canelo couldn't KO Golovkin like he said he would. I had Golovkin winning with his jab and his control of the ring. The so called running that you claim Golovkin did is taught in every boxing gym in the world. It's a fundamental boxing tactic.
How come GGG fans acting sour g****s??
Collapse
-
Thanks for answering. What you just described is a very close fight that could have gone either way and not the one sided beat down you said it was. I don't think GGG was a clown and he took the fight to Canelo in the last 3 rounds. You clearly don't like GGG so you might have be giving all the close rounds to Canelo.I scored the rematch for Canelo 115-113 live and the 2nd time watching. There was a few rounds that were close and I gave them to whoever landed the cleaner and more damaging punches. I'm no fan of either guy. I feel like most of the crying bunboys scored it with their nuthugging goggles since they're crying robbery on such a close fight. I say hype job exposed because once GGG fought good opposition he wasn't knocking them out. He looked mediocre compared to how his bunboys hyped him to knockout anyone at 160lbs. past and present. He is a good fighter but is absolutely nowhere near great. GGG's face is beat up a lot more than Canelo's was and Canelo was supposedly gonna get knocked out.
If Canelo fought Mexican style he would get knocked out was all the bumboys said. Canelo proceeds to fight Mexican style and GGG backpedaled and jabbed lol. It was running when Canelo did it and he was a clown. Hence why GGG was called a running cowardly clown. Turnabout is fair play... GGG should've kept his mouth shut.
.jpg)
Comment
-
canelo did the same in the first fight. but you were all over the forum btching and crying about canelo running, cant have it both ways fanboy...Thanks for answering. What you just described is a very close fight that could have gone either way and not the one sided beat down you said it was. I don't think GGG was a clown and he took the fight to Canelo in the last 3 rounds. You clearly don't like GGG so you might have be giving all the close rounds to Canelo.Comment
-
I said it was a close fight. The only reason GGG is getting called a runner and **** is because he talked so much **** along with his bunboys. Always fun to troll trolls and upset delusional bunboys. I can hate a fighter and still score objective. Just like I can like a fighter but disagree with their bunboys making it appear that I hate the fighter. I don't hate GGG at all but I do hate the unwarranted hype he received from bum beating. I gave you my honest score and you're still not satisfied. So to counteract your untrue statement... you scored the fight with GGG nuthugging bias goggles.Thanks for answering. What you just described is a very close fight that could have gone either way and not the one sided beat down you said it was. I don't think GGG was a clown and he took the fight to Canelo in the last 3 rounds. You clearly don't like GGG so you might have be giving all the close rounds to Canelo.Comment
-
Sanchez was the guy who wanted Golovkin to fight in a certain style. Guess what? If that's what he wanted he had to sell it before the fight started. It's obvious they were on a different page judging by Sanchez's remarks after the fight. Just like in the first fight when Canelo was on the ropes and his corner was wanting him to stop. Golovkin chose to box Canelo and use his jab in the rematch. Canelo chose to try and get Golovkin to attack on the ropes so he could counter him in the first fight. Not necessarily what the coaches wanted to see. If you know anything about boxing history both guys fought Mexican style in the second fight. Mexican style doesn't mean you stand in the pocket like an idiot and take unecessary punches unless you believe Mexicans are ****** which they aren't. Both guys gave it their all and it was a great fight. There are a lot of Golovkin fans here that commended Canelo for his bravery and determination but your still jealous of Golovkin and can't stand that he has a loyal fan base.Golovkin was the one that begged Canelo to stand and trade. Golovkin was the one that built his image that everyone was afraid to slug it out with him and he was "Mexican style". Golovkin was the one moving backwards the whole fight. Golovkin was the one that was on the receiving end of the most damage.
Golovkin ended up looking like a clown. It was great.Comment
-
What risk only risk he took was losing to an old mayweather an that wasnt a risk everybody knew canelo was gonna lose to an over the hill mayweather. 36 yrs of ageComment
-
I believe they gave the fight to canelo for standing there because he knows he cant knock golovkin out an he couldnt win a second fight dancing around the ring so he did what everybody wanted to see an tried to walk ggg down but ggg always boxes... He never just stand there he moves with little steps back an to the side ggg lost for boxing an not brawling... If it was a brawling match canelo won but this is boxing ggg won both boxing matches by landing more punches on canelo.... Especially the second fight... Power punches dont trump jabs to me. The most effective punch in boxing is a jab. It allows you to setup every other punch. I dont see how u hit a guy 40 to 50 more times an you lose a boxing match.Whether it was great or not the fact is Canelo couldn't KO Golovkin like he said he would. I had Golovkin winning with his jab and his control of the ring. The so called running that you claim Golovkin did is taught in every boxing gym in the world. It's a fundamental boxing tactic.Comment
-
They already had their excuses ready last year.
They were saying GGG is in great shape and would fight well into his 40’s with how he takes care of himself.
As soon as the first fight was they said Canelo waited him out and he was old now after the Jacobs fight.
These BBB side fans are just hurt that they hyped him up and he got exposed as soon as he stepped up to elite competition.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment