I'm a JMM fan, and I don't like pointing the finger when people haven't tested dirty. But I'd guess he probably was.
Was Juan Manuel Marquez on Ped's?
Collapse
-
Not sure but one thing I do know is if someone is willing to drink their own piss thinking it gives them an advantage, would IMO for sure take something that is guaranteed to give you one.Comment
-
Cant but you're gonna have to do a little bit better then point out some pimples and claim steroids.
I've been on a few cycles myself and have never had acne so I wouldnt really put too much faith into zits.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Objectively, all things point towards yes. While Pac’s accusation can still be defended given his string of opponents (weigh drained hoya, broken chin hatton etc etc), not to mention those were his peak days as well.
He only started to slow than a 32 where most fighters do.
Marquez on the other hand, though no evidence as well, is a bit hard to defend. At 39 he started to grow hulk muscles, and started to send people flying in the ring while at the same time working with a guy who laughs at all of boxing’s testings.
We can sugarcoat it, and pretend all we want that it can’t be true but it just seems to point all the way there.
He couldn’t knock manny down in any of their outings, suddenly he is one punching manny.Comment
-
Every fighter is on PEDs according to the boxing world.
That's how easily people dismiss their achievementsComment
-
I believe so but when su****ions were heavily raised it was in a fight in which Marquez arguably looked his worst, the only thing that had improved was his punching power, all of his other physical attributes were compromised. Above 135 I would say Marquez looked his absolute best in the 3rd fight against Pacquiao, I strongly doubt Bradley would have beaten that version.Comment
-
The great Mexican legend Juan Manuel marquez. The Rodney Dangerfield of boxing. I say no, but canelo got caught doe. It was the meat doe, He's a multimillionaire doe, he can buy kobe beef doe.Comment
Comment