I thought he won the first one but I had Canelo 7-5 in the second. It was really close though and I wouldn't have argued if Golovkin got the decision or it was another draw.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: HBO's Lampley: Overwhelming Majority Saw Golovkin Win, Twice
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postso, you criticize " stans "
and then you quote " stans "
makes sense
umm..... I will side with most fighters/trainers
no wait, I don't need to..... because I watched the fight
And a lot of fighters had it for GGG as well.
Big article from today on Eleider Alvarez scoring it for GGG
And yeah, I generally tend to trust paid analysts who get paid to watch hundreds or thousands of fights per year over guys who mostly have CTE and mostly watch their own fights or those of people they're fighting.
I have the same opinion about most football players too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The D3vil View PostI watched the fight too and like most of the known universe had it for GGG.
And a lot of fighters had it for GGG as well.
Big article from today on Eleider Alvarez scoring it for GGG
And yeah, I generally tend to trust paid analysts who get paid to watch hundreds or thousands of fights per year over guys who mostly have CTE and mostly watch their own fights or those of people they're fighting.
I have the same opinion about most football players too.
like the judges ?
all of whom were within one solitary point..... none of whom scored that fight to Golovkin
you guys might just have to let it go
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postlike the judges ?
all of whom were within one solitary point..... none of whom scored that fight to Golovkin
you guys might just have to let it go
The same type of people who get accused of corruption every week?
Yeah, I'll take the analysts who have little to no motivation to be bought off or hold a grudge and usually fans who also aren't on the pay roll.
Face it, most of the objective people (analysts and fans) had it for GGG.
Even a lot of Mexicans had it for GGG. You're more of a stan than Mexicans?
GET OVER IT!
Comment
-
Originally posted by The D3vil View PostOh yeah, the same type of people who always give Canelo favorable cards in Las Vegas even when he lost every round to Mayweather?
The same type of people who get accused of corruption every week?
Yeah, I'll take the analysts who have little to no motivation to be bought off or hold a grudge and usually fans who also aren't on the pay roll.
Face it, most of the objective people (analysts and fans) had it for GGG.
Even a lot of Mexicans had it for GGG. You're more of a stan than Mexicans?
GET OVER IT!
those analysts and " fans " are not objective
most of them are stans
the three most qualified people were trained, sanctioned, and sitting ringside
write me a fkn novel explaining how your stans are more qualified to score a fight than those dedicated professionals..... and MOST fighters/trainers picked Canelo..... which is another indicator that the stans who are crying robbery, are just crying
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postthose analysts and " fans " are not objective
most of them are stans
the three most qualified people were trained, sanctioned, and sitting ringside
write me a fkn novel explaining how your stans are more qualified to score a fight than those dedicated professionals..... and MOST fighters/trainers picked Canelo..... which is another indicator that the stans who are crying robbery, are just crying
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostThose dedicated professionals have a spotty history of bad decisions going back to when boxing first had judges.
no, they are experienced veteran's
experienced veteran's who ALL saw the same thing, and differed only by 1 solitary point
" spotty " is how you would describe many of Golovkin's fanbase
Comment
Comment