Comments Thread For: HBO's Lampley: Overwhelming Majority Saw Golovkin Win, Twice

[kushking]

What do you think about Floyd Mayweather?

Hes a pos too,so what; that doesn't mean Lampley hasn't consistently proven to almost ALWAYS show bias towards mexican fighters. It could be just blind fanaticism/blind nationalism/or pure hatred but one things clear Atlas/Lampley have ALWAYS hated on mexican fighters ever since JCC/Barrera etc. I won't say same about Lederman,who I just think counts jabs equally to power punches.

[alexjust]

I had to just repeat this again! Which do you respect more??? REAL Fighters that lived the game their entire LIFE??? Or HACK writers who cant even score fights properly and NEVER even count body work???

Good one. How many of the three judges on this fight had professional boxing careers? Tell me something about knock outs delivered by Adelaide Byrd.

Not every lawyer would become a good judge. Not every boxer would become a good coach. A fighter, IMO, is more susceptible to a bias then a journalist. And most journalists either had it for GGG or a draw.

Lennox Lewis scored it for GGG. So did Danny Jacobs (who has a financial interest in seeing Canelo win). The list on GGG side can also be lengthy.

[bigdunny1]

So nobody sitting at the table calling fights with Jim Lampley thinks GGG won the fight not past or present. Old analysts George Foremen and Larry Merchant thought he he didn't won. And the 2 men calling with him Roy Jones and Max Kellerman didn't think he won. And the 3rd guy who fills in and calls fight Andre Ward didn't think he won. But Jim saying GGG was robbed what a bias cvnt go cry and hopefully you don't show up in the news for beating your bytch again

[Citizen Koba]

Bumlovkin has not done enough to warrant induction into the HOF. Not even close...

You think GGG won't be inducted? What odds would you put on that?

[Hatesrats]

Is this the episode that Lamps was $ucking Munguia off in or a newer one???
Is the "Gatti list" still a thing???

I'll check out later.

[BirdSong]

and now we have another fight that will endlessly be argued about for years most likely

this one truly is one of those fights tho, its was that close, anyone who saw this more than 1 round either guy is a bit suspect scoring

canelo didnt deserve to lose this one but i dont think golovkin did either, he put in a huge effort last 4 or 5 rounds, what a fight it was, canelo just had that little bit more gas in the tank at the end possibly

[jsmith_tsu]

Triple-jab fans gonna point to this as some sort of validation for their claims that he got robbed, even though 95% of the time they claim Lampley is a moron. Love it.

Triple Jab. That's hilarious, even tho doubling and tripling is a good weapon.

I hope it's ok to use that one down the line and pretend like I came up with it

[Nightfall]

I had lil G winning close, but would've accepted a draw. The thing that bothered me was that the two judges that had the scores of 115-113 are the same two that gave alvaroidz the last round. Something fishy about that.

[Madison Boxing]

Lol why are people crying? All the polls and media scorecards have golovkin winning both fights. Most fighters don't actually score the fights properly round by round as they are drinking,chatting and enjoying themselves etc and not actually judging like the press are. Whether u thought canelo won or not Is irrelevant, the vast majority thought golovkin won both which is all Lampley is saying

[kushking]

Good one. How many of the three judges on this fight had professional boxing careers? Tell me something about knock outs delivered by Adelaide Byrd.

Not every lawyer would become a good judge. Not every boxer would become a good coach. A fighter, IMO, is more susceptible to a bias then a journalist. And most journalists either had it for GGG or a draw.

Lennox Lewis scored it for GGG. So did Danny Jacobs (who has a financial interest in seeing Canelo win). The list on GGG side can also be lengthy.

1st of all thats a lie that most journalist are unbiased,their the most biased. And the only people who actually have spent thousands of hours FOR FREE learning how to properly score am/pro fights (they all start in amatuers & most continue to on the side like byrd for example)are the judges ringside. And out of 6 judges in 2 fights the 1 judge who saw ggg winning was also 1 of the judges who had him losing the 2nd fight. Canelo convinced 3 judges he won by outlanding in power shots,at a higher rate,& by 87% margin to the body in 2nd fight,& 85% in 1st fight..

The is the 1st time in history a fighter was allowed to basically pick the judges(ggg),& he was allowed to pick judges who had already judged his favor in previous fights. 2 judges out of the 6 were judges who had ggg beating Jacobs by 115-112(bs cards yet no outrage from Lampley),so they are CLEARLY pro ggg judges.