Should Charlo fight Canelo in Vegas

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vasyl’s dad
    He said no rematch
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 23510
    • 1,120
    • 1,945
    • 50,072

    #1

    Should Charlo fight Canelo in Vegas

    And take a flat fee of 1-2 million? It would be his biggest payday. According to many here, fighters should take the short end of the stick no matter what. If he doesnt is he ducking his biggest payday and Cashnelo?

  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #2
    Why not??? certain posters and Abel as well said GGG didnt have to fight Charlo period...I really dont wanna see the same posters trying to act like they are Charlo fans now

    Comment

    • Pechorin
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2014
      • 1226
      • 76
      • 19
      • 42,108

      #3
      Yes, he should take that amount for a Canelo fight. Nobody knows who the Charlie are, nobody.

      Comment

      • bballchump11
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 4900
        • 739
        • 1,553
        • 53,366

        #4
        He should hope for a purse bid.

        Comment

        • satiev1
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2015
          • 4661
          • 575
          • 0
          • 78,492

          #5
          Charlo has zero chance of beating canelo.

          Comment

          • VatoMulatto
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2003
            • 8168
            • 289
            • 218
            • 104,445

            #6
            Originally posted by satiev1
            Charlo has zero chance of beating canelo.
            Let's make the fight and see what happens.

            Comment

            • mrpain81
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jun 2007
              • 12115
              • 986
              • 870
              • 35,268

              #7
              He really has no say.

              Comment

              • rolshans
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2017
                • 1489
                • 43
                • 2
                • 40,737

                #8
                Let's do a real comparison.

                If he's offered it, should Charlo accept a $15M flat fee to fight Canelo?

                Abso-fuxkin-lutely!

                Comment

                • Scipio2009
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 13741
                  • 276
                  • 64
                  • 98,172

                  #9
                  Jermall Charlo is entitled to a 25% share on the bid as mandatory challenger, and Alvarez vacating the belt still gets Lions Only Promotions Charlo-MonroeJr for the WBC 160lb belt as their first event.

                  $1m-$2m isn't going to cut it

                  Comment

                  • Vasyl’s dad
                    He said no rematch
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 23510
                    • 1,120
                    • 1,945
                    • 50,072

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Scipio2009
                    Jermall Charlo is entitled to a 25% share on the bid as mandatory challenger, and Alvarez vacating the belt still gets Lions Only Promotions Charlo-MonroeJr for the WBC 160lb belt as their first event.

                    $1m-$2m isn't going to cut it
                    Mandatory for what belt? 1-2 to should be plenty for a guy who has never made that much. According to your logic we have seen in the past concerning flat rates.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP