Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So GGG ducked the “elite” competition in his prime, but fought them in mid-thirties?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
    The hypocrisy and double standards of the Euro crowd is hilarious. Canelo moves and boxes but it's running for him. GGG moves and jabs but now he's boxing and not running. GGG clearly ducks mandatory for Vanes and gets stripped... business move doe by GGG fans. 154-168lbs... unless you aren't a bum. But slurp away at the hype job... he's been exposed. He is a good fighter but not great like his bunboys hoped. Supposed ducks don't count for legacy especially when your resume is filled with 95%+ bums.
    Are business decisions good for fighters?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Curt Henning View Post
      because he had no resume and was the b-side to cotto and canelo.....dummy
      Where in the rules does it say this?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Real boxer View Post
        Where in the rules does it say this?
        lol...what a cowardly, womanly, response...of course there are no written rules

        but when canelo or anyone wanted a crack at floyd they did what he said......thats pretty much how its gone for years now....b-sides who need a resume builder or payday do what the other guy says......this new to you? lol....jesus....the low levels u guys will go to defend lil g.....it never ends

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Real boxer View Post
          Why would he have to cater to any fighters demand?
          Because he was the bum beater B side! The guy is and was no ****ing star. You want to fight stars you give in to them. Floyd gave in to Oscar's demands because Oscar was the A side star. I doubt many ducked the bum beater with how diva he was in the Canelo negotiations.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Real boxer View Post
            Are business decisions good for fighters?
            Good business decisions are good for them. Might not always be good for fans though.

            Fighting a bum 154lber, in his middleweight debut, coming off a loss and a long layoff instead of fighting your mandatory as champion and getting stripped for it is not a good business move. Especially when you bs and supposedly dream about getting all the belts. I guess not paying the sanction fees is smart bidness for a bunboy doe. He's just lucky that Canelo fight still happened.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Curt Henning View Post
              lol...what a cowardly, womanly, response...of course there are no written rules

              but when canelo or anyone wanted a crack at floyd they did what he said......thats pretty much how its gone for years now....b-sides who need a resume builder or payday do what the other guy says......this new to you? lol....jesus....the low levels u guys will go to defend lil g.....it never ends
              Good for them. Thats their choice. Some people will let others take advantage of them. Some people are more knowledgable about their own value and wont sell themselves short. Doing “what he said” is about as womanly as it gets.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
                Because he was the bum beater B side! The guy is and was no ****ing star. You want to fight stars you give in to them. Floyd gave in to Oscar's demands because Oscar was the A side star. I doubt many ducked the bum beater with how diva he was in the Canelo negotiations.
                Again, what rule states you have to give in to anothers demands?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
                  Good business decisions are good for them. Might not always be good for fans though.

                  Fighting a bum 154lber, in his middleweight debut, coming off a loss and a long layoff instead of fighting your mandatory as champion and getting stripped for it is not a good business move. Especially when you bs and supposedly dream about getting all the belts. I guess not paying the sanction fees is smart bidness for a bunboy doe. He's just lucky that Canelo fight still happened.
                  Golovkin got the Canelo rematch. Looks like it was a good business decision to me.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by iamboxing View Post
                    The devil will throw in some truth in with his lies to sound credible. Saying Canelo won is an honest assessment, but then some haters will add that GGG was exposed and was ducking fighters his entire career which is a lie. Combine them together and you have a new narrative that becomes truth over time. Hitler did it best.

                    The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don't listen to him. Remember that - do not listen.
                    - The Exorcist
                    It is pretty sad to see the narrative changed as it is being, regardless of whether you thought GGG deserved the nod or not against Canelo.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Real boxer View Post
                      Golovkin got the Canelo rematch. Looks like it was a good business decision to me.
                      So you support diva antics and ducking... good to know

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP