Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Canelo Deserved The Win in Golovkin Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
    Sulaiman knows where his bread is buttered.

    gotta admit, there is some truth in that

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
      Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. Sulaiman is right. The fight was so close that couldn't have been considered a robbery.

      Moreover, the fight could have seen either fighter get the nod. It could have been easily scored a draw. However this time, the judges gave it to Canelo.

      GGG won a close fight too that many thought could have gone either way with Jacobs. Many thought he had lost that fight or believed it was at least a draw. However, he was awarded very close decision.

      We just might as well get used to it. It's just the way of the world.


      yep

      people who are crying robbery are admitting that they are clueless

      Comment


      • #13
        Gordo jr cant stop suckin Gingers bad meat lol

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          yes, true

          problem is, he is right

          "everything that was criticized about Canelo in the first one, this time he did it the other way around... Canelo went forward, threw more punches and fought....."

          by the same token..... everything that was criticized about Golovkin, stayed the same..... still no body-work, still no cutting off the ring with relentless pressure, still nowhere near enough dominance from a fighter who is supposed to be this feared killer

          Canelo fought Golovkin exactly how they wanted, and they performed worse than in the first fight..... Golovkin simply could not get his game going

          the people who are crying robbery are nuts
          Exactly

          Good post.

          Comment


          • #15
            Well, that settles it. Mauricio's got no "beef" with the decision.

            Comment


            • #16
              We all know who this fat crooked f*** wanted to win. Wbc has been finding ways to hand Canelo belts he didn't deserve since he was 20 yrs old. Guaranteed he's too puss to enforce the mandatory after Canelo spit in his face 2 yrs ago for trying to enforce the first wbc mandatory of his career.

              Comment


              • #17
                Yeah? Go weave Canelo a new belt Sulaiman.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  We all know who this fat crooked f*** wanted to win. Wbc has been finding ways to hand Canelo belts he didn't deserve since he was 20 yrs old. Guaranteed he's too puss to enforce the mandatory after Canelo spit in his face 2 yrs ago for trying to enforce the first wbc mandatory of his career.
                  Who's the Mando??? Charlo?? I'm down for that? You gonna finally put some $$$ up or just talk sht like a Kunt? Lately anyone you take has been LOSING!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post
                    Yeah? Go weave Canelo a new belt Sulaiman.
                    Did they give GGG the WBC participation medal like they did Danny Garcia??? Nope! They didn't because GGG ran out the ring CRYING!

                    But here it is anyways GGG. GOOD JOB!!!

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                      Who's the Mando??? Charlo?? I'm down for that? You gonna finally put some $$$ up or just talk sht like a Kunt? Lately anyone you take has been LOSING!
                      haven't you lost enough in your life from making bad bets? You celebrate for taking someone's account in a bet but go silent when it's brought up that you admitted to losing your wife in a bet gone wrong. F*** off loser.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP