Comments Thread For: Canelo: Why Keep The Judge Who Scored First Fight For GGG?

[aboutfkntime]

Actually since you disagree, the antithesis is on you to provide counter evidence to prove that the provided scorecards are not to be included in the worst scorecards ever.
Given the severity and frequency of unreasonable scorecards, it is fair to say he is one of the boxers to have received wildly favourable scorecards.
It's up to you to provide counter evidence to other boxers with as frequent and erroneous scorecards in order to prove your point, so please go on.
and alphabetical order would be nice thanks

take your time

no, wait..... hurry lol

no, it is not lol

I am under no compulsion whatsoever to provide "counter evidence" to disprove an outlandish claim that some casual-fan pulled out of his butt-hole

you are the guy who valiantly rode in to save the day..... so, hoppit spanker..... do your research, and get back to me

I will wait

no, just a sec..... I will not wait

that fight was close as hell..... so EVERY legitimate robbery is much worse than the dribble that casual fan decided to cry about

give yourself an uppercut

[aboutfkntime]

wow you're an idiot. The facts are the 5 scorecards i listed which back up my statement that Canelo had received more favorable scorecards from judges than anyone in boxing ever. Now if you want to disprove that statement,find just 1 fighter that has had more than 5 terrible scorecards than those 5 I mentioned. You can't! Because their isn't one and even if there was, you don't know enough about boxing to figure out who it was. So either do your research and prove me wrong, if not stfu and take your usual L. ******.

post your research son

you are the casual who decided to pull some dribble out of his ass and run with it..... so, where is your research?

post every " favorable " scorecard throughout boxing history (LOL)..... and we will see

you..... did actually research the subject..... right ?

or..... did you ?

the scores you posted did not affect the outcome of ANY of those fights, and the Golovkin fight was close as hell..... so EVERY legitimate robbery is much worse than the dribble you decided to cry about

[Jab jab boom]

no, it is not lol

I am under no compulsion whatsoever to provide "counter evidence" to disprove an outlandish claim that some casual-fan pulled out of his butt-hole

you are the guy who valiantly rode in to save the day..... so, hoppit spanker..... do your research, and get back to me

I will wait

no, just a sec..... I will not wait

that fight was close as hell..... so EVERY legitimate robbery is much worse than the dribble that casual fan decided to cry about

give yourself an uppercut

you're just getting embarrassed by everyone on this forum for being an idiot. You tried to sound smart by using the word compulsion but failed miserably. I stand by my statement and you not even being able to provide the name of 1 fighter who comes close to having those ridiculous scorecards in their favor 5 times proves my point. You also saying that the outcome of those fights wasn't impacted by the terrible scoring is even more ridiculous. Ggg deserved the win in the eyes of many, as did lara. There were even credible boxing people who thought cotto and trout ourbixed canelo. Now, you watch canelo fights while wearing a Canelo thong and red wig so it's impossible for you to be subjective but nobody with sense had Canelo winning any of those fights by such a lopsided margin.

[SUBZER0ED]

Your heart sank when you heard that Adelaide Byrd wouldn't be back for this fight, didn't it, Red?

[aboutfkntime]

you're just getting embarrassed by everyone on this forum for being an idiot. You tried to sound smart by using the word compulsion but failed miserably.

wtf ?

kid, I am under no compulsion to address your fantasies lol

I stand by my statement

that is because you are an idiot looool

and you not even being able to provide the name of 1 fighter who comes close to having those ridiculous scorecards in their favor 5 times proves my point. You also saying that the outcome of those fights wasn't impacted by the terrible scoring is even more ridiculous. Ggg deserved the win in the eyes of many, as did lara. There were even credible boxing people who thought cotto and trout ourbixed canelo. Now, you watch canelo fights while wearing a Canelo thong and red wig so it's impossible for you to be subjective but nobody with sense had Canelo winning any of those fights by such a lopsided margin.

FACT: the scores you posted, did not even affect the outcome of the fight you silly crybaby

just off the top of my head..... Whitaker vs Chavez, Bradley vs Pacquiao, Hoya vs Trinidad..... were all much worse, NO RESEARCH REQUIRED lol



stop talking BOLLOCKS !!

[bojangles1987]

What an unbelievable piece of **** Alvarez is. This makes me think Moretti is on the take this time around. There's always at least one judge that's on the take for Alvarez fights.

[daggum]

why isn't byrd scoring this fight again? she's the only one who knew what was going on.

[bojangles1987]

I'm sorry, nothing against you as a poster or person, but it's a proven fact that most of Canelo's big fights he has a judge notoriously and ridiculously on his side, to the point of scoring a fight so lopsided in his favor it gets people suspended. It really is corruption at it's finest.

Not most, ALL his big fights. Every noteworthy fight of his that has gone the distance has had at least one obviously corrupt scorecard in his favor. Even the Cotto fight, which was a clear but competitive Alvarez win, had overly wide scorecards in Alvarez's favor.

You can guarantee at least one judge will be corrupt in his favor for the Golovkin rematch. Hopefully controversy doesn't ruin this one, too. Hopefully a fair stoppage makes it a non-issue.

[Jab jab boom]

wtf ?

kid, I am under no compulsion to address your fantasies lol





that is because you are an idiot looool





FACT: the scores you posted, did not even affect the outcome of the fight you silly crybaby

just off the top of my head..... Whitaker vs Chavez, Bradley vs Pacquiao, Hoya vs Trinidad..... were all much worse, NO RESEARCH REQUIRED lol



stop talking BOLLOCKS !!

you get dumber each time you post. I said name 1 fighter who has 5 more ridiculous scorecards in 5 fights than the ones I listed for Canelo and you mentioned 3 fights with all different fighters that were considered bad decisions by many. That's not helping your pathetic attempt at challenging my post. You're not even a worthy advisary. You're so ******, it's a wonder how you haven't killed yourself by accident yet.

[stealthradon]

no, it is not lol

I am under no compulsion whatsoever to provide "counter evidence" to disprove an outlandish claim that some casual-fan pulled out of his butt-hole

you are the guy who valiantly rode in to save the day..... so, hoppit spanker..... do your research, and get back to me

I will wait

no, just a sec..... I will not wait

that fight was close as hell..... so EVERY legitimate robbery is much worse than the dribble that casual fan decided to cry about

give yourself an uppercut

Either English isn't your strong suit, being non-native English-speaking, or you are intentionally lying.

In the original statement he mentioned far more than the GGG fight, but you somehow omitted that now, didn't you?
Care to explain that discrepancy?
Either you are lying or you can't read.
Pick one, idiot.
Those are your only options.

Liar or can't read.