Comments Thread For: Golovkin: Canelo Did Nothing Special, Did Not Fight Mexican Style
Collapse
-
Oh yeah? Well that's funny because Canelo didn't beat him the first time. A draw is not a win, and it was a bull**** draw at that. Why does he need him to fight differently? He's asking him to backup what he's saying and go for the knockout.Comment
-
What exactly is Mexican style?
The style of Miguel Canto? Of Salvador Sanchez? Of Juan Manuel Marquez?
Or the style of Golovkin?Comment
-
Do p.o.s on this sight remember when Conello said Mexicans don't fuc around. Then turns around and ducks GGG for 2 years hanging out at 155. The when he does finally fight he fights off his back foot the whole fight. Talking all that shyt but then refusing to back it up. Then getting booed out of T-mobile arena. Fight fans want toe to toe action. They want their moneys worth. Mexican Style. Barrera ,Marquez, Chavez Jr. Pintor, Sanchez and the list goes on. Stop Making excuses for The Diva saying Mexican style Don't exist. When I just gave you a list of great mexican style fighters. You protection boys make me sick. But I know it's all G's fault for hyping the up the fight. Leave Conello alone! I know we get it from you groupies.Comment
-
So you left off Chavez Sr. on purpose? There's your answer. Think Salvador and think JCC Sr. Starts off slow, tends to want to take a few punches to feel out his opponent's power, will not completely slip, squat and pivot like a slick fighter (ala Sweet Pea) but will rather just roll with the punch, will take 2 punches sometimes just to deliver one power shot, will be methodical in breaking/wearing down opponent (Salvador, JCC Sr.)...and I don't need to go any further. If you can't ascertain the history of this style (especially as it played out in the 70's/80's with Mexico v. Puerto Rico, then I don't know what else to say. Maybe start watching new age MMA?Comment
-
Comment