Yes, You Can Bury Broner But...

[daggum]

This exactly.

Broner's best win was a split decision over Paulie.

Not exactly HOF material is it?

but paulie is amazing i mean just look at his resume...

[The Big Dunn]

Maybe the answer is to put Loma and Broner in the ring together and let them fight. Mikey fought him so it would make for a good contrast. Imagine if Broner beat him?

[koolkc107]

An untested and green Russell
A washed Martinez fresh off two wars with Salido.
A decent, yet past prime Linares.

Not to mention a Rigo old and two weightclasses too much, a Walters who was on the shelf a year, and assorted neverwas fighters.

No, I am not saying Broner has a HOF resume.

I am saying neither does Loma.

Far from it.

And out of the two, Broner's trash may be a better accomplishment.

Not hard to figure out if you are objective.

[koolkc107]

Maybe the answer is to put Loma and Broner in the ring together and let them fight. Mikey fought him so it would make for a good contrast. Imagine if Broner beat him?

Loma would never take that fight.

Adrien is way too big and Loma doesn't have Mikey's defense.

He knows Broner would spark him out.

[koolkc107]

is this supposed to be defending broner or bashing him? i honestly can't tell cause that list is garbage. loma beat 2 guys who were #1 or went on to be #1 and a #5 guy. broner beat a guy who was #1 and a guy who was #8 but coming off a robbery win. the rest weren't even ranked i don't get it and this is just the people they fought for belts. if you look at the entire resume it gets much worse for broner oh wait there is gavin rees nm

With all due respect, you are not looking deep enough.

When you look at who they fought and when they fought them, it's clear that not only is the level of competition comparable but, if there is an edge, it goes to Broner.

You take a look at some of Loma's wins and you find the guys he beat either not fighting anymore or fighting guys with double digit losses...just like they were before they fought Loma.

By contrast, a lot of Broner's opposition (win or lose) goes on to have meaningful fights afterwards.

To me, that says Broner fights more guys with more left in the tank.

[BLACK KNOT]

Maybe the answer is to put Loma and Broner in the ring together and let them fight. Mikey fought him so it would make for a good contrast. Imagine if Broner beat him?

lol broner would get schooled and he would only be the 5th or 6th best name on loma's resume.

[BLACK KNOT]

LOL the only thing broner is better than loma at is catching sexually transmitted diseases!

[BLACK KNOT]

Loma would never take that fight.

Adrien is way too big and Loma doesn't have Mikey's defense.

He knows Broner would spark him out.

do you want broner to kill himself? because that's what would happen after he loses to lomachenko. broner doesn't let his hands go at all and he doesn't have the bully mentality in the ring in fact he's the one who gets bullied. broner is too ****** loma figures him out and schools him easily. broner kills himself in the locker room afterwards.

[daggum]

With all due respect, you are not looking deep enough.

When you look at who they fought and when they fought them, it's clear that not only is the level of competition comparable but, if there is an edge, it goes to Broner.

You take a look at some of Loma's wins and you find the guys he beat either not fighting anymore or fighting guys with double digit losses...just like they were before they fought Loma.[

By contrast, a lot of Broner's opposition (win or lose) goes on to have meaningful fights afterwards.

To me, that says Broner fights more guys with more left in the tank.

yes when you look at who and when they fought loma fought more guys that were higher ranked. when you look at what guys did after losing to loma and broner only russell jr became #1 at 126. which broner opponent that he beat(not lost to) became #1??? how about #2? how about #3? was it malignaggi? gavin rees? granados? khabib? walters, rigo, and linares haven't been active since loma beat them so that means they ****** when he fought them? no. the guys that broner beat ****** when he fought them and ****** afterwards.

[yammy25]

The belt wasn't vacant with Paulie. Paulie won it against Senchenko, and defended it against Cano before facing Broner.

He won 4 belts.. two were vacant and the other two were against paulie and gavin rees