Comments Thread For: Oquendo: When I Win The WBA Title, I'll Be in The Record Books

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShoulderRoll
    Join The Great Resist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 56048
    • 10,087
    • 5,027
    • 763,445

    #31
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
    Has nothing to do with real or fake. Charr is the WBA world champion. Joshua is the WBA super champion. The super championship commands more respect in the present, but if the WBA ever phases out titles as promised, it's the super title that is going away and the world title that will live on.
    Exactly, the super title commands more respect at the moment. So the other WBA title shouldn't get anyone in the record books at the moment.

    Comment

    • ddeg10
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2003
      • 567
      • 94
      • 36
      • 12,280

      #32
      I feel bad for Fres. He had some tough decision losses that should've gone his way

      Comment

      • N/A
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 9269
        • 214
        • 0
        • 12

        #33
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
        Exactly, the super title commands more respect at the moment. So the other WBA title shouldn't get anyone in the record books at the moment.
        That's not how facts work. Charr is WBA world champion. He's in the record books. Because the WBA also has super champions, WBA world champions have rightly lost some of their prestige. Personally, I don't recognize any WBA titles as world titles and haven't since 2001. Wish more would have followed suit.

        Comment

        • ShoulderRoll
          Join The Great Resist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 56048
          • 10,087
          • 5,027
          • 763,445

          #34
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          That's not how facts work. Charr is WBA world champion. He's in the record books. Because the WBA also has super champions, WBA world champions have rightly lost some of their prestige. Personally, I don't recognize any WBA titles as world titles and haven't since 2001. Wish more would have followed suit.
          Charr is WBA word champion but he's not even the best WBA heavyweight champion out there right now.

          So his belt has been rendered meaningless.

          Comment

          • daggum
            All time great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 43562
            • 4,589
            • 3
            • 166,270

            #35
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
            That's not how facts work. Charr is WBA world champion. He's in the record books. Because the WBA also has super champions, WBA world champions have rightly lost some of their prestige. Personally, I don't recognize any WBA titles as world titles and haven't since 2001. Wish more would have followed suit.

            Comment

            • N/A
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2017
              • 9269
              • 214
              • 0
              • 12

              #36
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
              Charr is WBA word champion but he's not even the best WBA heavyweight champion out there right now.

              So his belt has been rendered meaningless.
              You determine meaning for yourself. Nobody else can tell you what you should find meaningful. Me personally, I never recognized the WBO and I stopped recognizing the WBA when they instituted super titles. I only recognize the WBC and IBF as world titles.

              Comment

              • BLACK KNOT
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Mar 2018
                • 849
                • 41
                • 3
                • 10,363

                #37
                Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                You determine meaning for yourself. Nobody else can tell you what you should find meaningful. Me personally, I never recognized the WBO and I stopped recognizing the WBA when they instituted super titles. I only recognize the WBC and IBF as world titles.
                I'm sure if the wbo paid you like the wbc wba and ibf does you'd be singing a different tune!

                Comment

                • N/A
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 9269
                  • 214
                  • 0
                  • 12

                  #38
                  Originally posted by BLACK KNOT
                  I'm sure if the wbo paid you like the wbc wba and ibf does you'd be singing a different tune!
                  The sanctioning bodies aren't the ones that pay me. Why would you think the WBA pays me when I'm advocating that they should be de-recognized and no longer considered a world title?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP