Tweet
Do you think Lomachenko did enough at 130 to be considered a top 10 ATG there? He beat Walters and Rigondeaux, and dominated everyone he fought at that weight.
-
-
Shut the fùck up you **** riding hoe. Jeesus fùcking Christ with you people!
Walters is garbage and Rigondeaux had to move up two classes but Lomo won't move up two classes. A lot of gay men on this site, so weird!
-
No..............Comment
-
Comment
-
Huh? He's already moved up two weight classes. He started at 126 and won a title and just won a title at 135.
If you mean won't move up two weight classes as in won't move up two classes in one fight well very few fighters have done that recently.
Anyway he's not top 10 all-time at 130. He had too few fights there. I think that's a better answer than to get all angry and pissy with a dude for posing a question.Comment
-
how is anyone top 10 in any weight class with only 5 fights there? hahaha.Comment
-
Some of the junior divisions are so new that without a set criteria (i.e minimum fights) there may be some divisions. I think Tito Trinidad is top 10 all-time at 154 and he only had four fights there. His 2000 campaign and a non-title fight in 1997 vs. Troy Waters.
130 is fairly deep though. Kid Chocolate, Flash Elorde, Alexis Arguello, Floyd Mayweather, Manny Pacquaio, Julio Cesar Chavez, Alfredo Escalera etc;Comment
-
So he's top 10 because he beat Walters and rigondeaux? AKA a featherweight and a super bantamweight
He's never beaten a top 130 pounder
Comment
-
Rocky Martinez was ranked #1 in the division so that would classify as a top 130-pounder surely? Historically, no but he was the top 130-pounder in 2016.
Walters also moved up to 130 before Lomachenko so one could argue Walters was beaten by a Featherweight in Lomachenko.Comment
-
needs to do what hes done, multiplied by 5.Comment
Comment