Uhmmm, hey Mauricio......... you have a little something on your chin there...... might want to wipe that off....
Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Win or lose, Canelo is free of any question of doping
Collapse
-
So what the wbc is saying is.. If he wins or loses the positive tests aren't a part of canelos history and he's innocent.
This is as ****** and insulting to us fans as a murder victims family being told in court whether the killer of your family member pleads innocent or guilty his crimes will not be taken into consideration and forgotten/swept under the carpet.
I don't support such bollocks in fact the wbcs statement reeks of bias & favouritism towards canelo and is not to dissimilar to the fanboy comments on here which I expect, but to hear it from the wbc is disgusting.
Argue all you want about the clean tests since, but there are things called undetectable peds ask memo heridia. Moneys the root of all evil and canelo has enough ways and means to get away with carte blanche.Comment
-
YEESSSS. NOW that this is finally settled we can move on!!!.....not sure it works like that, good ole WBCComment
-
Comment
-
In the eyes of true boxing fans Canelo will still be judged.
The traces found were low yes BUT as a professional athlete and with the top people around you, you should know better and have your food prepped which can be traced back to a reliable source.
What made the matter worse was the fact he knew there was a problem in his own country with it and still took the risk.
All this of course is if you believe the tainted meat story. Personally I don't believe and think he was caught at the end of a cycle.
War Golovkin!Comment
-
Well that depends, if Canelo wins GGG hardcores and canelo dislikers will say he was doping. If Canelo loses then he was doping Last fight, but lost this fight because he wasn’t doping and would have lost last fight had he not been doping then. It’s tricky I knowComment
-
Comment
-
-
Haha. I really do see why WBC has been called 'we be crooks'. They went from being hardasses "Canelo must defend against his mandatory" and refusing to budge on the timeline, to proclaiming Canelo's innocence when nobody has any facts, to now making blanket statements even though nobody knows the truth.Comment
Comment