Comments Thread For: Canelo's Coach To Sanchez: Canelo Did NOT Run, It's Movement!

[Shadoww702]

Because Lara didn't need to rest like Canelo does. By the way, if you saw the fight, the compubox stats should have been much wider than that in favor of Lara. To me it seemed Canelo only landed about 50 bodyshots, with a lot of them landing on the gloves and arms, and less than five head shots. He looked foolish for most of the fight.

I saw it live? how you see it??? And they surebas sht was working on Lara's body in between rounds an awful lot for just gloves and arms landing... That one thing I like about LIVE! You can watch them in between rounds plus hear and feel the ring shake if close enough.

[Shadoww702]

They'll blame Hillary and call the decision fake judging.

For SURE! They're already selling EXCUSES like popcorn!

[allen23]

I cant argue there. Both fight were very close. I scored GGG/Canelo 7-5 G and 7-5 Canelo over Lara. I have no problem with a draw either one.

My only issue is with these rtarded GGG fans that scored it 8-4 or higher EASILY??? Telling me GGG won 8+ rounds is pathetic and Byrd'ing the other way...

lots of broadcasters and former fighters scored it 8-4 GGG...and rightly so

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

For SURE! They're already selling EXCUSES like popcorn!

And they haven't stopped crying since last year...
BoxingScene will have to provide grief counseling services
when Golovkin get's beaten more convincingly this time!

If Golovkin get's knocked out, his pseudo-Mexican fans will
call it the worst disaster since the Mexico City earthquake of 1985.

[allen23]

And they haven't stopped crying since last year...
BoxingScene will have to provide grief counseling services
when Golovkin get's beaten more convincingly this time!

If Golovkin get's knocked out, his pseudo-Mexican fans will
call it the worst disaster since the Mexico City earthquake of 1985.

why are u claiming canelo won the first fight u just sound ******ed in fairness

[IRONCHINHAGLER]

Lara and Floyd dont "RUN" ...its "MOVEMENT"!!! Lol! Wat a joke of a trainer....."tainted meat" from a lifelong butcher....

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

why are u claiming canelo won the first fight u just sound ******ed in fairness

Because I saw Canelo beat Golovkin in a fairly close fight,
but it was competitive and stylistically subjective enough
that a sensible person shouldn't have been outraged over
the draw. I accept the outcome, unlike most people here.
Despite the fervor of armchair internet experts who insist
that Golovkin won convincingly, it was competitive and
it wasn't hard to find well-known boxing personalities who
had contrasting views on the outcome. It was NOT as
one-sided as Golovkin's fans want to believe.
However, all of this will be moot in September, when they
have the chance to settle the debate once and for all.

In fairness, run-on sentences, with spelling errors and a
complete lack of punctuation, can make the writer appear
lazy, dull, or both.

[allen23]

Lara and Floyd dont "RUN" ...its "MOVEMENT"!!! Lol! Wat a joke of a trainer....."tainted meat" from a lifelong butcher....

the irony of it all..had they come out and said they made a mistake there would be some room for forgiveness with time but they're arrogance in denial is pathetic

[whoseyourdaddy]

Sure i agree with Clenelos team but they are acting like Hypocrites...they Called what Floyd did to Nelo "Running" when he dominated him. Also when many people saw Lara outboxing Canelo they called it "Running". But now when the fans see Golovkin winning a fight vs Canelo that was ruled a draw they call it "movement"

GTFOH Canelo never said Mayweather ran, he was and is very respectful of Mayweather, he has always said the best man won, I lack experience but I'll be back better, stronger. Bring a post of Canelo discrediting Mayweather's win, I bet you can't find any because there is non.

Regarding Lara yes he said he ran, and he did a few times when he gave his back as he was moving away from Canelo, hell Canelo hit him at least 3 times on the back for the same exact reason.

[allen23]

Because I saw Canelo beat Golovkin in a fairly close fight,
but it was competitive and stylistically subjective enough
that a sensible person shouldn't have been outraged over
the draw. I accept the outcome, unlike most people here.
Despite the fervor of armchair internet experts who insist
that Golovkin won convincingly, it was competitive and
it wasn't hard to find well-known boxing personalities who
had contrasting views on the outcome. It was NOT as
one-sided as Golovkin's fans want to believe.
However, all of this will be moot in September, when they
have the chance to settle the debate once and for all.

In fairness, run-on sentences, with spelling errors and a
complete lack of punctuation, can make the writer appear
lazy, dull, or both.

of course u accept the outcome as a canelo fan. He lost, and what makes it worse he cheated and he still lost. time and time again he gets favoured by the judges and this is just another case of money over fair result