Let’s Get This Wilder Hate Out Of The Way

[N/A]

He forgot the most important one ....the MISSING link ( the one showing what Ortiz was ranked when Wilder fought him )!

Not sure if you understand how words work, but I was replying to what the other poster said. That is how you have a conversation. You are replying to something nobody said, because you are a troll.

Ortiz was removed from the rankings when he failed a drug test. Ten days after losing to Wilder, new rankings were published and Ortiz was ranked #4.

[juggernaut666]

Not sure if you can read, but the poster said "You are the bias clown if you think Ortiz was ever ranked higher than Povetkin."

Clearly there have been many times where Ortiz was ranked higher, including right now.

You cant post links that support a legitimate system and then say its not legit when it doesn't fit your storyline when concerning Wilder who by that rankings site NEVER fought anyone in a top ten in title fights.

[N/A]

You cant post links that support a legitimate system and then say its not legit when it doesn't fit your storyline

The poster said Ortiz was never ranked higher than Povetkin. That's a lie. He's been consistently ranked higher than Povetkin and he's ranked higher right now.

Wilder who by that rankings sight NEVER fought anyone in a top ten in title fights.

That's a lie. Wilder fought Stiverne in a title fight when Stiverne was #3. http://www.tbrb.org/2015/10/10/13-january-2015/

[juggernaut666]

The poster said Ortiz was never ranked higher than Povetkin. That's a lie. He's been consistently ranked higher than Povetkin and he's ranked higher right now.




That's a lie. Wilder fought Stiverne in a title fight when Stiverne was #3. http://www.tbrb.org/2015/10/10/13-january-2015/

Wilder was not the champion in Stiverne 1 ...he NEVER fought anyone in the top 10 as champion ( hence title fights , i didnt say title FIGHT )....nice try though .

Ortiz is only ranked in the WBC and you have yet to show any type of official rankings concerning what you're arguing with that other poster .

[stellen]

First he was ducking Ortiz (even though Ortiz popped for juice). Then Wilder sought him out anyway and it was “Ortiz is going to crush this hype job”. Then Wilder knocks him clean out and it’s “Ortiz was garbage and old”. Now it’s “Fury will outbox Wilder easy”. If Wilder beats Fury (which is a VERY tough fight, Leonard was gone for years came back and took Hagler to the limit, if you’re elite you’re elite. Plus Fury is young, in shape, motivated and lineal champ) then it will be “Fury sucks he wasn’t the same or was always trash”.

So you haters might as well say it now. Never mind that Ortiz and Fury are far superior wins than Takam, Parker and Povetkin (the same juicer Wilder was going to fight IN RUSSIA, that just went life and death with The Ghost Of David Price). But you biased clowns will hate anyway because that’s all you’re good for. So start hating in this thread now get it out of your system.

Its made up, BS posts like this that make you despise wilders fanboys. No one with a brain cell is tipping the gypsy oaf to win. AND if you want to get the wilder hate out of the way then hide the alabama frauds resume. HIDE IT GOOD. Because one look at that document will have anyone frothing with hate. How can anyone remain wbc champ for so long fighting that list of cans!

[N/A]

Wilder was not the champion in Stiverne 1 ...he NEVER fought anyone in the top 10 as champion ( hence title fights )....nice try though .

Again, you appear to not understand how words work. Here's what you wrote:

"Wilder who by that rankings site NEVER fought anyone in a top ten in title fights"

Stiverne vs Wilder 1 was a title fight. Stiverne was #3 in the world. So, you were lying.

[juggernaut666]

Again, you appear to not understand how words work. Here's what you wrote:

"Wilder who by that rankings site NEVER fought anyone in a top ten in title fights"

Stiverne vs Wilder 1 was a title fight. Stiverne was #3 in the world. So, you were lying.

I didn't say title FIGHT .

That would indicate a LONE fight wouldn't it ?

I said title FiGHTS ( defending as a title holder ).


Maybe it is you who do not understand ? ,Well you continuously get corrected on here anyway , a forum you're not even supposed to be allowed on bc you are paid to pollute it which is actually TROLLING . lol

But the site is run by staff who are Wilder protection supporters so you get away with it !

[daggum]

Ortiz wasnt ranked when Wilder fought him by the Transnational rankings if you are supporting their rankings system .

he supports it sometimes. other times he ignores it. why should it matter what a guy is ranked when the actual fight happens?

[juggernaut666]

he supports it sometimes. other times he ignores it. why should it matter what a guy is ranked when the actual fight happens?

It matters bc the WBC clown is quick to point out Klitchko was unranked vs Joshua in the rankings hes pointing out but when its brought to his attention that Ortiz wasnt either vs Wilder and Wilder never fought a top 10 as champion he then ignores it !

[N/A]

I didn't say title FIGHT .

That would indicate a LONE fight wouldn't it ?

I said title FiGHTS ( defending as a title holder ).

That's not how words work. You said Wilder never faced a top ten opponent in his title fights. Stiverne was a title fight. Stiverne was #3. So you were lying. Now you're trying to move the goal posts.