Originally posted by pittapatta66
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo Beat Golovkin 115-113, GGG Can't Adjust!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post3??? Why stop there? Why not give GGG all 12?? May 13 and 14 rounds for good measure.
Another GGGTard and his Byrd Jr.
9 rounds at LEAST to 3 for GGG.
This is why GGG fans are a JOKE. Or should I call them soon to be Lomachenko #1 fans.
Sept. 16th 2018 Lomachenko just got 97K followers overnight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post3??? Why stop there? Why not give GGG all 12?? May 13 and 14 rounds for good measure.
Another GGGTard and his Byrd Jr.
9 rounds at LEAST to 3 for GGG.
This is why GGG fans are a JOKE. Or should I call them soon to be Lomachenko #1 fans.
Sept. 16th 2018 Lomachenko just got 97K followers overnight
Comment
-
I thought Golovkin won but he doesn't adjust well like De la Hoya said. Canelo used simple head movement to make him miss. He kept following Canelo to the ropes and refused to go the body. Canelo wasn't moving once he was on the ropes so you would think he would be vulnerable to the body but he kept going for headshots and missing a lot more than he was connecting.
He also didn't adjust to Jacobs counters. He was getting tagged by shots he just didn't see coming.
Comment
-
115-113 is fair to be honest. I personally think GGG landed enough Jabs and controlled the pace enough to edge out the win. GGG will definitely need to adjust and throw more to the body and stop headhunting as much. If he doesn't adjust Canelo will win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dreamking View Post115-113 is fair to be honest. I personally think GGG landed enough Jabs and controlled the pace enough to edge out the win. GGG will definitely need to adjust and throw more to the body and stop headhunting as much. If he doesn't adjust Canelo will win.
Comment
-
Everyone saying GGG needs to adjust . GGG says he doesn't need to.
This fight could look alot like the 1st one.
Comment
Comment