Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Hopkins Will Cheer Canelo To Derail Record Attempt

[aboutfkntime]

You arguing semantics is not going to change the facts that ALL boxing organisations recognize the WBA belts.
As seen here:
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions

you provided a link to the WBA website, you muppet

so..... GTFOH

AND, nothing in that link proved that the other org's recognize the shhtty WBA junior titles

" title(s) " lol

trust a Golovkin fan to have no idea what the word champion means LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

By having multiple belts?

trust a Golovkin fan to have no idea what the word champion means LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

You arguing semantics is not going to change the facts that ALL boxing organisations recognize the WBA belts.
As seen here:
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions

what is semantics about this question, you short-bus riding munter?

how is it even possible for a sanctioning body to recognize more than one champion in a single division?

.

ALWAYS showing a complete lack of understanding for the sport

ALWAYS proving that you have no feel for the game whatsoever

..... ALWAYS riding the short bus with the other casuals lmao

[jas]

ggg has to win clearly man

too many forces that want canelo to win

[stealthradon]

what is semantics about this question, you short-bus riding munter?

Listen **** slurper, I know you are so dumb nobody would fúcking notice if you got hit in the head repeatedly.
But WBA says there are multiple champions, you say there is not.

I wonder who we should trust.
"The ‘super’ title was initially thought to be just for special occasions, in which it would give a fighter who perhaps held multiple belts the chance to put off mandatories."

[strykr619]

the guy I am talking to, stealthidiot..... thinks that a alphabet org can have three different champions in a single division SMH

I am sick of idiot casuals

Casuals make me laugh thou , the assbackward talking points are funny.

[aboutfkntime]

Listen **** slurper, I know you are so dumb nobody would fúcking notice if you got hit in the head repeatedly.
But WBA says there are multiple champions, you say there is not.

I wonder who we should trust.
"The ‘super’ title was initially thought to be just for special occasions, in which it would give a fighter who perhaps held multiple belts the chance to put off mandatories."

trust a Golovkin fan to have no idea what the word champion means

how is it even possible for a sanctioning body to recognize more than one champion in a single division?

[stealthradon]

trust a Golovkin fan to have no idea what the word champion means

how is it even possible for a sanctioning body to recognize more than one champion in a single division?

Because they have set up a system where they can?

It's really dead simple.

[aboutfkntime]

Listen **** slurper, I know you are so dumb nobody would fúcking notice if you got hit in the head repeatedly.
But WBA says there are multiple champions, you say there is not.

I wonder who we should trust.
"The ‘super’ title was initially thought to be just for special occasions, in which it would give a fighter who perhaps held multiple belts the chance to put off mandatories."

you absolute fkn turnip.....

no wonder why you did not supply a link to that quote

this quote lol.....

The ‘super’ title was initially thought to be just for special occasions, in which it would give a fighter who perhaps held multiple belts the chance to put off mandatories.

I found that quote in an article entitled.....
A guide to boxing’s ‘legitimate’ world titles and which ones should fans actually take seriously?.....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/43889...is-eubank-jnr/

that very same article also says this.....

"..... boxing fans decided they would only accept the highest form of champion.

If you ever see a weight class where there is a WBA ‘regular’ champion and a WBA ‘super’ champion, dedicated boxing fans will only consider the ‘super’ champion to be the real king, as he holds the highest version of the WBA title"

read your own link, you absolute fkn turnip lol

[aboutfkntime]

Because they have set up a system where they can?

It's really dead simple.

wait, there's more.....

the WBA crowns up to four titleholders in the same weight class -- super, regular, unified and interim -- seemingly only for the sake of generating more sanction fees. Some fighters and promoters are all too happy to go along with it too.

It’s enough to drive me, and others, crazy because whatever short-term gain there might be for the few individuals who benefit from all the extra belts, I’ve never thought it was worth the long-term damage to whatever credibility was left in the sport. It just smacked of ******ity to have more than one titleholder in the same organization in the same division.....
http://www.espn.com/blog/dan-rafael/...mber-of-titles


it appears that YOU, are a fkn turnip