>>> Mikey Garcia's resume is better than Loma's...
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
So Loma shouldnt be ranked highly because he lost his 2nd pro fight vs a Salido who didnt even make weight?
Well that seals it then that GGG is way superior to both Hopkins and Hagler.
Hopkins lost vs a total bum in his pro debut, Clinton Mitchell. Hopkins = terrible.
Hagler lost to Bobby Watts and Willie Monroe. Hagler a bum.Comment
-
And the guys that put Linares too sleep are nowhere near the level in talent, patience, technical ability or defense that Mikey is. There aren't many boxers out there that have all that plus timing like Mikey at this moment.Comment
-
ROTFLMMFAOOriginally Posted by Fat Dan Rafael
"Besides fighting for Crolla's world title and Linares' symbolic "diamond belt," they will also be squaring off to assume the vacant 135-pound lineal world title, with the winner of the bout on Saturday (AWE and Klowdtv.com, 2:30 p.m. ET) at the Manchester Arena in Crolla's hometown of Manchester, England, earning the right to be called the division's true champion."
Fat Dan? Really?
Rafael is cluess beyond where to get the best deal on an all-you-can-eat buffet.
You gotta do better than that son.Comment
-
If losses factor into the equation then exactly how do you justify ranking Lomachenko ahead of Garcia? Especially when that loss came to an Orlando Salido caliber of fighter...I agree with you that losses have to factor in to how you rank fighters p4p because they are part of the resume same as wins and draws.
I note that Mikey beat Salido while Salido beat Loma.
Those things stated-I have Loma at #2 and Mikey at #4 in my p4p rankings. There isn't a huge gap IMO. I think Loma's resume is slightly better.Comment
-
Comment
Comment