Comments Thread For: Loeffler: Golovkin is 1 Win Away From Breaking Hopkins Record

[aboutfkntime]

In a fight by the rules of boxing I'd pick Golovkin to beat Hopkins. I admire Hopkins because he started late and really worked on making the most of his career but his style in many fights was horrible. If he would have fought in the Hagler Leonard era he would have been DQed for excessive holding and other tactics. He knew what he could get away with and he played it.

that is because you are an absolute tool

how does you disliking Hopkins style help Golovkin beat him ?

I cannot believe the ******ity you commit to print lol

like this.....

when Golovkin said "anyone from 154-168".....

..... he meant, AT 160

[aboutfkntime]

if Golovkin could beat Hopkins he wouldn't have been stripped for ducking Derevyanchenko lol

[SUBZER0ED]

if Golovkin could beat Hopkins he wouldn't have been stripped for ducking Derevyanchenko lol

So you fault Golovkin for taking the rematch with Canelo over Derevyanchenko? You do realize that the original step-aside was for the rematch that got canceled because of Alvarez, right?

[TonyGe]

that is because you are an absolute tool

how does you disliking Hopkins style help Golovkin beat him ?

I cannot believe the ******ity you commit to print lol

like this.....

Did you even bother to read my post before you seized on what you saw as a fatal flaw as an opportunity to rebutt. What I said clearly in my post is if Hopkins was forced to fight by the accepted rules of boxing as enforced in previous eras ie Hagler Leonard he would lose against Golovkin.

[aboutfkntime]

So you fault Golovkin for taking the rematch with Canelo over Derevyanchenko? You do realize that the original step-aside was for the rematch that got canceled because of Alvarez, right?

he didn't take the rematch over Derevy, he fought fkn Vanes

why didn't Hypekin fight Saunders instead of Vanes? lol

I can't wait to hear your excuse for that

1) Saunders was running around with Bullshhtkin's " dream "
2) a unification > a mando...... so Bullshhtkin would not have been stripped for avoiding Derevyanchenko

..... so, why didn't they fight Saunders, for Golovkin's "dream"?

ya muppet

[aboutfkntime]

Did you even bother to read my post before you seized on what you saw as a fatal flaw as an opportunity to rebutt. What I said clearly in my post is if Hopkins was forced to fight by the accepted rules of boxing as enforced in previous eras ie Hagler Leonard he would lose against Golovkin.

you are a fkn muppet for attempting to compare Hypekin to Hopkins

/story

one IS great..... one only pretended to be

one-dimensional punchers do not beat Hopkins

[SUBZER0ED]

he didn't take the rematch over Derevy, he fought fkn Vanes

why didn't Hypekin fight Saunders instead of Vanes? lol

I can't wait to hear your excuse for that

1) Saunders was running around with Bullshhtkin's " dream "
2) a unification > a mando...... so Bullshhtkin would not have been stripped for avoiding Derevyanchenko

..... so, why didn't they fight Saunders, for Golovkin's "dream"?

ya muppet

Check your facts again, skippy. Fighting Derevyanchenko by August 3rd would have surely scrapped the September 15th rematch with Canelo. The original waiver was granted for the May 5th Canelo rematch. You mean to argue that since Alvarez ruined that fight date with his failed drug test, Golovkin was supposed to take a last minute fill-in fight with his mando or Saunders? Ludicrous.

[TonyGe]

you are a fkn muppet for attempting to compare Hypekin to Hopkins

/story

one IS great..... one only pretended to be

one-dimensional punchers do not beat Hopkins

They probably can because Hopkins style was a mixture of excessive holding, headbutts, low blows and running. That's his stock in trade. Further more Golovkin isn't a one dimensional puncher. He's a good ring general that beat good opponents. Now if you asked me could he beat Roy Jones or Marvin Hagler I'd say no. Hopkins yeah Gennady would beat him.

[HeadShots]

you are a fkn muppet for attempting to compare Hypekin to Hopkins

/story

one IS great..... one only pretended to be

one-dimensional punchers do not beat Hopkins

that bum jermain taylor did twice. lmao

[aboutfkntime]

Check your facts again, skippy. Fighting Derevyanchenko by August 3rd would have surely scrapped the September 15th rematch with Canelo. The original waiver was granted for the May 5th Canelo rematch. You mean to argue that since Alvarez ruined that fight date with his failed drug test, Golovkin was supposed to take a last minute fill-in fight with his mando or Saunders? Ludicrous.

1) bullshht !!
2) they could have simply deferred it, fcuk Clenelo

I ask you again.....

1) Saunders was running around with Bullshhtkin's " dream "
2) a unification > a mando...... so Bullshhtkin would not have been stripped for avoiding Derevyanchenko

..... so, why didn't they fight Saunders, for Golovkin's " dream "?

ya muppet