Comments Thread For: Golovkin: Canelo is Dirty For Using Substances & Blaming Others!

[Raggamuffin]

In most people’s eyes he already beat him boxing. He clearly out jabbed him, which means you better be able to box.

Of course he wants Canelo to trade. He believes in his power and his chin. Plus maybe he wants a good show. Also there is a good reason for him to believe he will not get a fair shake with the judges (as witnessed in last fight).

Canelo already tried to box and overwhelming majorities of fans, boxers and judges thought he lost. Of course he could box better and that could very well be enough to win the fight. We will see on 9/15.

Only GG fans think that the fight was a robbery. I had it a draw. GG is just baiting Canelo into a brawl. We all know that GG relied on his jab and that's it because of the fear of the incoming. Lets see what he does this time around.

[mathed]

I thought the site caught duplicate posts?

[sterilizer]

Stop speaking out of emotion like a female, and bring facts. Prove he cheated.

Both males and females can speak out of emotion, depending on the circumstances. So your comment in response to whatever other comment, is plain ******. I am female and I can be as rational as the next guy or really emotional some other time. Totally misogynist and ****** comment that of yours, you should be ashamed of your utter bias. But I guess it comes from ignorance, so you don't even realize how ridiculous you sound.

[Diego Rodriguez]

Only GG fans think that the fight was a robbery. I hand it a draw. GG is just baiting Canelo into a brawl. We all know that GG relied on his jab and that's it because of the fear of the incoming. Lets see what he does this time around.

I have said it once I have said it a hundred times. Every bad decision is not a robbery. In fact there are few robberies. But overwhelming majority of fans, media and boxers had it for Golovkin. It was a bad decision IMO and in most people's eyes. I sat in a bar in Mexico with at least 200 Mexicans and there was no doubt that same sentiment that Golovkin won existed there too. To get Canelo to a draw you had to virtually give him every toss up round. He won maybe two rounds decisively. IMO if you are giving every close round to him a person is biased.

That is all water over the dam and doesn't mean anything now.

[boxinggod101]

Golovkin is a piece of ***** for trying to force the narrative that Canelo "used substances."

If Canelo did get clen in his system from tainted meat then he wasn't deliberately trying to cheat. There is no proof that he was looking for an illegal advantage.

That's a distinction that has to be made and that Golovkin should acknowledge.

I'd like to see your post if GGG had eaten tainted meat lol

[Raggamuffin]

I have said it once I have said it a hundred times. Every bad decision is not a robbery. In fact there are few robberies. But overwhelming majority of fans, media and boxers had it for Golovkin. It was a bad decision IMO and in most people's eyes. I sat in a bar in Mexico with at least 200 Mexicans and there was no doubt that same sentiment that Golovkin won existed there too. To get Canelo to a draw you had to virtually give him every toss up round. He won maybe two rounds decisively. IMO if you are giving every close round to him a person is biased.

That is all water over the dam and doesn't mean anything now.

This was a bad decision to you, not me. You can be aggressive all you want, but it has to be effective aggressiveness. And imo GGs aggression wasn't effective enough for me to say that he clearly won. Canelo coasting cost him the fight imo. He landed the cleaner, harder and more telling blows.

[Diego Rodriguez]

This was a bad decision to you, not me. You can be aggressive all you want, but it has to be effective aggressiveness. And imo GGs aggression wasn't effective enough for me to say that he clearly won. Canelo coasting cost him the fight imo. He landed the cleaner, harder and more telling blows.

Didn't say it was to you. There were at least two judges who thought some Korean guy beat Roy Jones Jr. in the Olympics. You aren't ever going to get 100% agreement.

Frankly I'm tired of going back over that fight. I've seen it numerous times and discussed it too much. It is over. I like most people who watched the fight, media who scored it and boxers who spoke said they thought Golovkin won and it was by a big majority.

In the end I always make my own judgement about a fight. I really do not give a crap what corrupt and incompetent judges have to say. I thought it was a clear Golovkin win. That is how it will go down in my books. But that's that fight, this is a new fight.

[BattlingNelson]

Golovkin is a piece of ***** for trying to force the narrative that Canelo "used substances."

If Canelo did get clen in his system from tainted meat then he wasn't deliberately trying to cheat. There is no proof that he was looking for an illegal advantage.

That's a distinction that has to be made and that Golovkin should acknowledge.

What?? Canelo tested positive twice! It’s always up to the positive tested athlete to prove his innocence. He didn’t do that. All we know is that it is POSSIBLE that his positive test came from meat contamination. It’s also possible that it came from the****utic use. Whatever is the case the bottom line is he had an illegal drug in his system and that is the athletes responsibility. Don’t twist it.

[ShoulderRoll]

What?? Canelo tested positive twice! It’s always up to the positive tested athlete to prove his innocence. He didn’t do that. All we know is that it is POSSIBLE that his positive test came from meat contamination. It’s also possible that it came from the****utic use. Whatever is the case the bottom line is he had an illegal drug in his system and that is the athletes responsibility. Don’t twist it.

You yourself admit it, it's possible that the positive test came from meat contamination. We don't know for sure.

So for Golovkin to act like Canelo deliberately cheated is reprehensible. Unless he has proof of that he should shut his mouth.

[Raggamuffin]

Didn't say it was to you. There were at least two judges who thought some Korean guy beat Roy Jones Jr. in the Olympics. You aren't ever going to get 100% agreement.

Frankly I'm tired of going back over that fight. I've seen it numerous times and discussed it too much. It is over. I like most people who watched the fight, media who scored it and boxers who spoke said they thought Golovkin won and it was by a big majority.

In the end I always make my own judgement about a fight. I really do not give a crap what corrupt and incompetent judges have to say. I thought it was a clear Golovkin win. That is how it will go down in my books. But that's that fight, this is a new fight.

I scored it a draw. And if you have information on corruption in the first fight..please share it with us. That's why they do rematches. To solve unanswered question in the first fight. Don't cry corruption if you have zero proof.