adamak is like 50 years old and hasnt fought a live body in nearly 5 years, good lord he is going to get splattered.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Miller-Adamek, Vargas-Dulorme, Beterbiev-Johnson Set - Oct. 6
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BennyBlanco View PostDulorme: 2-2 in his last 4 fights; his only wins were against journeymen. Vargas: 2-2-1 in his last 5 fights.
So you're right...a B- fighter vs. a B- fighter should be competitive. But interesting? Not at all.
Adamek is NOT a decent name for Miller's resume. Adamek should have retired long ago and he isn't even a real heavyweight. It's a terrible mismatch.
Comment
-
I agree that today's younger boxing fans have come to expect this level of trash, and thus some consider this a fairly decent card. In truth, it's typical garbage. Beterbiev against a British level guy. Miller against a washed up cruiserweight. Vargas (who can never win a big fight) against a disappointing one time prospect. Now what's so "decent" about this card?
Comment
-
Originally posted by rolshans View PostPeople were saying Hearn's last card was trash too, and look how dumb they ending up looking! Lmao!
Originally posted by Vinnykin View PostThe first month is free yes? why wouldn't any one pick it up for one month? you don't have to watch it live either.Originally posted by DougalDylan View PostThe first month is free for Americans so basically you're complaining about free boxing that's harsh.
You see what the trolls should do is say well I'm getting a lot of free boxing fights (including some big fights eg AJ, Andre) and praise it then when the second month rolled in and you had to pay the rest would listen to your opinion but when you start with complaining about lots of free stuff you give yourself away as a troll.Originally posted by SOLARPLEXUS View PostBut would you pay for this + Joshua vs Povetkin + Saunders vs Andrade which you would also be getting within the 1 month peroid? (ignoring that the first month is free anyway)
Comment
-
Comment