Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Miller-Adamek, Vargas-Dulorme, Beterbiev-Johnson Set - Oct. 6

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    adamak is like 50 years old and hasnt fought a live body in nearly 5 years, good lord he is going to get splattered.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by SOLARPLEXUS View Post
      But would you pay for this + Joshua vs Povetkin + Saunders vs Andrade which you would also be getting within the 1 month peroid? (ignoring that the first month is free anyway)
      I don't like to stream but that is what's going to happen.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by BennyBlanco View Post
        Dulorme: 2-2 in his last 4 fights; his only wins were against journeymen. Vargas: 2-2-1 in his last 5 fights.

        So you're right...a B- fighter vs. a B- fighter should be competitive. But interesting? Not at all.

        Adamek is NOT a decent name for Miller's resume. Adamek should have retired long ago and he isn't even a real heavyweight. It's a terrible mismatch.
        Beterbiev-Johnson and Roman vs McDonnell are fights that i really like...and Vargas is a top 10 guy whether you like it or not

        Comment


        • #54
          2 solid fights, one meh fight and a HW blowout. Not an ideal start, but I'll be watching on a free trial basis

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by BigZ44 View Post
            2 solid fights, one meh fight and a HW blowout. Not an ideal start, but I'll be watching on a free trial basis
            ****ing lol do you make those sigs yourself mate?

            Comment


            • #56
              I agree that today's younger boxing fans have come to expect this level of trash, and thus some consider this a fairly decent card. In truth, it's typical garbage. Beterbiev against a British level guy. Miller against a washed up cruiserweight. Vargas (who can never win a big fight) against a disappointing one time prospect. Now what's so "decent" about this card?

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by rolshans View Post
                People were saying Hearn's last card was trash too, and look how dumb they ending up looking! Lmao!
                No they weren't. People were saying it should not be a PPV. Which it shouldn't have been

                Originally posted by Vinnykin View Post
                The first month is free yes? why wouldn't any one pick it up for one month? you don't have to watch it live either.
                Originally posted by DougalDylan View Post
                The first month is free for Americans so basically you're complaining about free boxing that's harsh.

                You see what the trolls should do is say well I'm getting a lot of free boxing fights (including some big fights eg AJ, Andre) and praise it then when the second month rolled in and you had to pay the rest would listen to your opinion but when you start with complaining about lots of free stuff you give yourself away as a troll.
                Originally posted by SOLARPLEXUS View Post
                But would you pay for this + Joshua vs Povetkin + Saunders vs Andrade which you would also be getting within the 1 month peroid? (ignoring that the first month is free anyway)
                Why the hell would I waste my free month on this when I can use it for the WBSS?

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by mlac View Post
                  ****ing lol do you make those sigs yourself mate?
                  I do, throwing them together is usually pretty simple once I've decided what I want to go for

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    I'll be watching. I'll be subscribing to DAZN next month.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Trash!!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP