Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: Lomachenko has good footwork but Pacquiao's is better!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by WhatDisButtonDo View Post
    Touche lol.
    Should we add Paul Gonzales to the list ?

    Comment


    • #42
      Probably one of the most ridiculous comments Roach has made and that's saying something. Look at what Loma did to Rigo, that says it all. If you want to argue that Pacquiao in his prime was quicker and therefore better then that is about all you can argue. Its not even close, the quality of Loma's movement is on another level.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by OCPancho View Post
        Should we add Paul Gonzales to the list ?
        But You have to agree that those are exception to the rules and not the norm man lol.

        Comment


        • #44
          Sorry but Loma would easily kill this 40 yo version of Pac

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by MisanthropicNY View Post
            Loma lost to Salido and was dropped by Linares in a fight that was 50/50 going into the round. Let's stop overhyping every new fighter.
            Siri is probably the must underated boxer. The guy is an animal. You practically need to kill that mofo to beat him.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
              Wait you're saying lomo only cuts 5 lbs and comes in to the right 5 lbs more than his weigh in weight. Damn that's a lot. Wow. Lol that's less than any top fighter right now.

              Terrence crawford and errol spence walk around 170 lbs and come close to 165 lbs fight night. I guess they should challenge themselves to and fight close to their natural weight.
              What’s so suprising is you sound so surprised! I’m sure you know other very good fighters who are fighting close to their natural weights. Ain’t Loma at their level for it to cry about?

              Or did you also mentioned that when he fought Rigo?

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Ogecca MaMa View Post
                Bha, Vasya will achieve everything possible and retire long before he turns 39. wake up buddy . while pac be still fighting, and fans crazy fanatics be saying like: "yo, check out his foot work at age 48, doubt your fighter will have same" like its something to be proud...

                he got a win, great. man should retire, instead he will get his beating that he deserves at his age very soon, if not his next fight. everyone got too crazy, Pac is back. there shouyld be pac vs Floyd II, straight bollacks. and afterall peops like you will dissappear with such comments again, going in full lurking mode, since only idiotsa believe into all this bull with Pac being back. Pac is true warrior, hard for him to retire. but if he won't you'll be wintessing him being koed or ending like Rjj..
                It’s not something to be proud of. But comparing a fighter’s footwork at the prime of his life to a 39 yr old and celebrating that his is better is not something to be proud of as well.

                I’m just defending the 39 yr old. And I want him to retire

                Lets just see how vasyl’s career unfolds. It kinda looks like he’ll be staying for 135 for a while, which is not a bad choice, or probably til retirement

                Comment


                • #48
                  couldn't agree more. Ok, let's simplify this crap for the moronic fanboys here, If you compare, the opposition that Pacquiao had vs the so called prime Loma right now; big IF here, if Loma had the same opposition that Pacquiao fought on his glory days, lomachenko has been stopped long ago. Dont get me wrong, he is good and probably the best at the moment. but, he hasn't seen the like of JMM, Morales etc.. that will walk towards those pitty patt punches he unloads. Yes, he has speed and footwork but the likes of JMM that has timing and willing to get hit to counter will make Loma weary. and to consider Pac has POWER but you see how those warriors mix it up back in the day? that's called balls of steel and heart of platinum. so tell me now on how the PRIME Loma will make pacquiao honest?
                  Last edited by o0Kilabot0o; 08-04-2018, 11:02 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Andrij View Post
                    40 year old Pacquiao has better footwork than prime Loma ?? LOL !
                    We all have opinions so be respectful to all who have them.
                    First, PAC is a better fighter overall. Especially when PAC is in his prime. NO DOUBT!!!!! With that said, PAC IMO would beat Loma at 140 & 147..Idk at 135,that's too light for PAC. He would lose power!!! But Loma doesn't want to fight PAC at 140 only at 135, he knows he will get KO'd by PAC at 140 (scared even@39yrs). If Loma wants to be great he should go up in weight to fight the top fighters like Mikey. Finally, PAC has way better footwork than Loma. That's my opinion!!!!!
                    Last edited by afont501; 08-04-2018, 11:17 PM. Reason: Correction

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Pozomuro View Post
                      Sorry but Loma would easily kill this 40 yor version of Pac
                      No way, too small. If that was true he would accept the fight already

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP