The growing disrespect for anthony joshua as a fighter & man

[Accolade]

Fury is babysitting 7 bottles of red wine more like.

Charles Martin (bum)

Joseph Parker (bum who lost to Hughie Fury, went 12 rounds with Cojanu, and lost to Ruiz)

41 year old Wladimir Klitschko with no belts coming off a 2 year layoff and an embarrassing loss to Tyson Fury

VS

Wladimir Klitschko at the peak of a decade-long title reign, holding all the belts except for the WBC.

AJ is babysitting Tyson Fury's belts.

[Tom Cruise]

In the last 3 years Joshua has fought:

Whyte (current top 10)
Martin
Breazeale (current top 10)
Molina
Klitschko (old but a legend)
Takam (current top 10)
Parker (current top 10)
And lined up to fight Povetkin (current top 10) next

In that time Fury has fought:

Safari
And lined up to fight Piniata.

Fury got done for drugs, went on a coke and food fuelled binge, put on 15stone and looked like he could barely get out of bed let alone defend the HW title. He was not the champ.

Call him lineal champ fine. That title can be just as unreliable as any other (please see the LHW and MW lineal titles). In real terms, Fury is not the champ

[SeGoodland]

Charles Martin (bum)

Joseph Parker (bum who lost to Hughie Fury, went 12 rounds with Cojanu, and lost to Ruiz)

41 year old Wladimir Klitschko with no belts coming off a 2 year layoff and an embarrassing loss to Tyson Fury

VS

Wladimir Klitschko at the peak of a decade-long title reign, holding all the belts except for the WBC.

AJ is babysitting Tyson Fury's belts.

Oh man, now I know you are just being a wind up.

v Fury, Klitschko is at his peak but against AJ its not a valid win. Joker.

You know Parker got the W against Hughie, right?

[Accolade]

Oh man, now I know you are just being a wind up.

v Fury, Klitschko is at his peak but against AJ its not a valid win. Joker.

You know Parker got the W against Hughie, right?

Considering that AJ fought a beltless Klitschko coming off a 2 year layoff and a shutout loss I'd say it's a much less valid win than Fury's, if you can even consider it valid LOL.

Hughie Fury got robbed. Ruiz as well. Also Charles Martin won the IBF belt because his opponent (who was also a bum) suffered a freak injury. AJ is babysitting Tyson Fury's belts.

[SeGoodland]

Considering that AJ fought a beltless Klitschko coming off a 2 year layoff and a shutout loss I'd say it's a much less valid win than Fury's, if you can even consider it valid LOL.

Hughie Fury got robbed. Ruiz as well. Also Charles Martin won the IBF belt because his opponent (who was also a bum) suffered a freak injury. AJ is babysitting Tyson Fury's belts.

Your opinion of what a win and a loss is, is proper confusing! lol.

A win is a win. A loss is a loss. Records cannot be disputed.

Agree that Hughie should have got something out of the fight, even if it was a rematch.

Yeah, fully appreciate that Martin was handed the belt but Martin was No3 and Glazkov was No1. Who else was going to fight for it? Btw, No2 was vacant. Martin or Glazkov would still have had a shot at Fury if he hadn't been stripped.

Also, lets not forget that Fury is took PED's. In my mind, he is now a drugs cheat. There is nothing to disprove that his victory against Wlad was down to the PEDs.

[uppercut510]

Fury used to be great. He's a bum now.

how is he a bum now? I don't get it

[rolshans]

I want Fury to start killing it. But forget AJ, because as of right now, Fury gets embarrassed even by Wilder.

[Accolade]

Your opinion of what a win and a loss is, is proper confusing! lol.

A win is a win. A loss is a loss. Records cannot be disputed.

Agree that Hughie should have got something out of the fight, even if it was a rematch.

Yeah, fully appreciate that Martin was handed the belt but Martin was No3 and Glazkov was No1. Who else was going to fight for it? Btw, No2 was vacant. Martin or Glazkov would still have had a shot at Fury if he hadn't been stripped.

Also, lets not forget that Fury is took PED's. In my mind, he is now a drugs cheat. There is nothing to disprove that his victory against Wlad was down to the PEDs.

Proper confusing? What? Anyway...

Not all wins and losses are equal you simpleton. Beating a bum who won a belt against a bum isn't the same as beating an actual champion. Beating a 41 year old man coming off a 2 year layoff and an embarrassing loss is not the same as beating a 38 year old man who's held the belts for a decade. Don't reply to any part of this message if you disagree with me on this point.

FACT: There's no definitive proof that Fury took PEDs for the first fight. He popped a year after the fight before their scheduled rematch, amid his coke binge. Your speculation means nothing to me. I think AJ is taking PEDs, yet I'm not dumb enough to claim that there's nothing to disprove this.

And do you really think Martin or Glazkov would have beaten Fury if they had a shot? Are you dense? lmao

AJ is babysitting Tyson Fury's belts.

[boliodogs]

Sorry but Fury doesn't get to keep his world title belts by sitting on his fat ass feeling sorry for his poor millionaire self and not defending them for years. He basically threw those belts away because he is an unstable depressed crybaby. AJ won those belts in the ring. He is a fighter who stays in great shape and is dedicated to being a boxing champion.

[rolshans]

Sorry but Fury doesn't get to keep his world title belts by sitting on his fat ass feeling sorry for his poor millionaire self and not defending them for years. He basically threw those belts away because he is an unstable depressed crybaby. AJ won those belts in the ring. He is a fighter who stays in great shape and is dedicated to being a boxing champion.

For sure. I'm personally hoping he regains those titles, but that last fight turned a lot of his fans off.