Wilder losing too Fury and the standing it leaves Wilder with .......
Wilder has one of the weakest resumes as a multiple defending champion in HW history as it stands thats just a fact .
The opponent he loses to in Fury would not have a relevant fight in over 3 years yet be able to defeat Wilder whos best win is 48 year old Ortiz would put a permanent blotch on Wilder .
This wouldn't be a good look at all and it would be somewhat comical when you take his entire resume including his only mandatory hes fought Stiverne who was inactive for 2 years .
Fury would be his most relevant fight ,the flip side to this is should he win the historical look will be that Fury was not 100% , thats just a fact !
Should Wilder actually take this fight ?
A loss crushes the Joshua fight , in the process it completely makes Wilders resume a mockery and Joshua being around enhances that bc he will continue to win against relevant opponents so the two ARE going to be compared when you look back and realise the foolish things you posted on here .
I would probably advise Wilder to actually use his brain for once and avoid this one , a loss to Joshua also severly hurts him but hes the under dog there and he gets actual real HW money.
A loss to Fury is almost sure to bury him bc in event a rematch claus is issued and he loses twice , he does not have the resume to bounce back in a worst case scenario like this and Finkel too can kiss the cashout fight goodbye !
Wilder has one of the weakest resumes as a multiple defending champion in HW history as it stands thats just a fact .
The opponent he loses to in Fury would not have a relevant fight in over 3 years yet be able to defeat Wilder whos best win is 48 year old Ortiz would put a permanent blotch on Wilder .
This wouldn't be a good look at all and it would be somewhat comical when you take his entire resume including his only mandatory hes fought Stiverne who was inactive for 2 years .
Fury would be his most relevant fight ,the flip side to this is should he win the historical look will be that Fury was not 100% , thats just a fact !
Should Wilder actually take this fight ?
A loss crushes the Joshua fight , in the process it completely makes Wilders resume a mockery and Joshua being around enhances that bc he will continue to win against relevant opponents so the two ARE going to be compared when you look back and realise the foolish things you posted on here .
I would probably advise Wilder to actually use his brain for once and avoid this one , a loss to Joshua also severly hurts him but hes the under dog there and he gets actual real HW money.
A loss to Fury is almost sure to bury him bc in event a rematch claus is issued and he loses twice , he does not have the resume to bounce back in a worst case scenario like this and Finkel too can kiss the cashout fight goodbye !
Comment