Comments Thread For: Hearn To Make "Huge" Offer To Wilder, For Whyte Bout in NYC

[juggernaut666]

Looks like we will hear Wilders next opponent now ,maybe even tommorrow considering outside Joshua he doesnt like money and prefers 1.5 Million fights so he certainly wont want 8 Million .


Also take into consideration 15 Million is crackhead money so with all of Wilders contradictions , no one actually knows what he wants ?


One minute its about legacy NOT money but then its about demanding 50% ?



I know one thing Wilder should stay away from Whyte and Breazeale and go after Kownacki to add to his stellar resume !

[Sid-Knee]

It’s jumping through the hoop for simple fact no one wants to see ****ty Whyte take on wilder besides aj nuthuggers and bodyguards..... no one cares about that **** dazn app in states so Hearn trying force Whyte and push that app on us, just gives us aj/wilder without the bogus flat fee that he prob still tries to offer if wilder takes Whyte fight

So you want Wilder to sit out until April? Have I got that right? Or do you want him to fight another bum so as not to threaten his cash-out fight with Joshua?

[Sid-Knee]

Hearn's "AJ bodyguard service" begins... Whyte is first, Then Chisora... ect.

But Hearn is not saying Wilder has to beat Whyte before he gets a shot at Joshua. So WTF are you talking about.

Wilder needs a fight while Joshua takes care of business against Povetkin. It makes all the sense in the world. At worst it would be the second best fighter he's fought. Plus it brings in serious money. Turning your nose up at this makes no sense what so ever. It's ****ing crazy talk.

[Sid-Knee]

Don't let Hearn distract you. Boxing fans want Wilder vs Joshua. That has not changed. Hearn claimed to be trying to make the Wilder vs Joshua fight, so don't try to justify Hearn trying to sell us a lesser fight now. Wilder is the WBC champion and has had a longer reign than Joshua, so it's incredibly disrespectful for Hearn to be trying to give Wilder ultimatums. "If Wilder beats this guy, I'll let him fight that guy." Nah, how about "when Joshua grows a pair, Wilder will let him try his luck."

Hearn isn't giving any ultimatums though is he? So you are saying Wilder should sit out or fight a bum instead?

And you call yourself a boxing fan? Holy ****.

[Sid-Knee]

Not following. Joshua's fight with Povetkin will be on DAZN, but obviously he's making most of his revenue in the UK where the fight will be on Sky Box Office.

Hearn keeps talking about Wilder's low profile, but fighting on a streaming service with at MAX 100-150k subscribers by the time he fights isn't going to help at all. He just did 1.2 million on SHO and you think he will just fight on a start up streaming service in the states? No chance. And I think Hearn is in for a rude awakening if he thinks Wilder fights Joshua on DAZN for the same offer he made in October. If he is to fight on DAZN, then that offer better go up to 20-25 million or a percentage share of the revenue.

Why would Wilder care about how many would watch on DAZN? He's a prize fighter, and this is a huge prize.

These excuses are going beyond crazy now. This place just gets worse and worse.

[juggernaut666]

But Hearn is not saying Wilder has to beat Whyte before he gets a shot at Joshua. So WTF are you talking about.

Wilder needs a fight while Joshua takes care of business against Povetkin. It makes all the sense in the world. At worst it would be the second best fighter he's fought. Plus it brings in serious money. Turning your nose up at this makes no sense what so ever. It's ****ing crazy talk.

Im honestly against this fight for 3 reasons .

1 .Whyte is more then capable of winning and its a CHANCE i dont get to see Joshua literally bully Wilder and knock him out inside 5 rounds .

2 . Id rather see Joshua vs Whyte rematch .


3 . If Wilder loses before Joshua id like to see Breazeale do it which would be F'ing hilarious though slimmer it COULD happen .


It would be a really good fight i hope it happens down the line if Wilder sticks around after Joshua defeats him bc we all know Whytes mando spot even if Joshua doesn't get at Wilder will be 2020 bc the WBC lets Wilder be the boss .

[Sid-Knee]

It will be on DAZN in the US.

In Britain, Sky Sports PPV.

So why in HADES would Wilder fight on DAZN, knowing that not only will Showtime ante up for the US rights but he might be able to negotiate for some of the SkyBox PPV as well?

You are right.

If it is DAZN, it better be more than 7M.

You think Wilder should get more than 7 mill if it's on DAZN?

Wow!!!!

Americans are ****ing creepy nut-jobs, man. This is way beyond tragic. You are not sane in any way. You are beyond anyone's help.

Tell you what, why doesn't Hearn pay Wilder 70 mill? Might as well say so. Whyte can give him his house and all of his belongings too. Why not clear his bank account while he's there?

Wow!!

[Raggamuffin]

It's an offer worth listening to. But the guarantee is that Joshua's ***** ass is next. I feel the WBC enforces their mandatory then all bets are off.

[lefthooklead]

Agree to fight Whyte if there is written confirmation the winner gets AJ next at Wembley.

[Sid-Knee]

If Whyte wants a shot at wilder, then he has to take whatever wilder feels like giving him. Wilder should offer him 2m with 40% of the UK rights. You don't make an offer to the champ, and Eddie doesn't offer anything to a major player like haymon. You take what you get if you want the fight.

Who gives a **** if Wilder has a title? And yes, you do make offers to champs, just like Garcia did to Lipinets for example.

Wilder isn't offering anything. He's not in a position to do so. He fights for peanuts you complete imbecile. Hearn is the one bringing the cash, not the 2 bit nobody Wilder. Why would Whyte take less of the British PPV when he will be the one they are buying it for? Whyte sells arenas out that are 20,000 strong. He's already fought on PPV, something he hasn't done yet because he's a nobody. But he should get most of the money? Deranged. Simply deranged.

God you Americans are freaks.