Whyte could make more money in a rematch with Joshua in the UK. Why is Hearn not interested in that fight? It makes more financial sense, doesn't it? Wrap your head around the fact that Hearn is using Whyte as a pawn to distract the public from the fight they've been demanding. The public was demanding Joshua-Wilder, and that has not changed. Hearn claimed to be prioritizing that fight, but now he's trying to sell Whyte as a better opponent for Wilder. We're asking the butcher for beef, but he's giving us spam. Don't come here and start telling me about the nutritional value of spam. It's not what we ordered.
Comments Thread For: Hearn To Make "Huge" Offer To Wilder, For Whyte Bout in NYC
Collapse
-
-
-
Right, just go back to SHO? So you mean Hearn will want Wilder/Whyte on DAZN, but wouldn't want Wilder/Joshua on DAZN? Are you that big of a moron? Don't you see what is going on? Hearn just wants to use Wilder to help launch DAZN to the American public. His initial unveiling was so underwhelming he knows he needs guys like Wilder for it to have any chance of succeeding. Hearn wasn't able to get any of the top names that he wanted and it looks like Garcia isn't coming anytime soon as his next fight vs Spence is set to be on SHO PPV.Comment
-
Nobody said Wilder should sit-out. He just should not let somebody else's promoter dictate who he fights. Are you saying Joshua should sit-out? Hearn could EASILY match Whyte/Chisora against Joshua. They'd pack any stadium in the UK, but Hearn would rather send those pawns to America to fight Wilder for less money than they could earn against Joshua. If Hearn is supposed to be looking out for the best interest of his fighters, why wouldn't he be putting them against the guy who packs stadiums? It should be easy for him to set-up those in-house fights, maximizing the revenue for himself and all of his clients. I guess it's more advantageous for Hearn to use Whyte/Chisora as shields for Joshua, so Anthony can fight anybody except the long-reigning WBC champion.
Are you that scared for Deontay that you would come out with such nonsense?
Hearn is a promoter, he's supposed to get Whyte a fight for a title. No protecting is going on. Or would you like Dillian to get the April date instead of Wilder? Make up your mind.
It shouldn't be a problem fighting for by far your biggest payday against Whyte. Wilder would easily beat him wouldn't he? So what is the problem?Comment
-
A side gets to choose location. AJ wants it in the UK so it happens there. End of story. If Wilder wants to spend his time screaming on the internet and then fighting bums in his spare time, then it's up to him. But please don't deluded yourself like it's legit or something.
The biggest fights take place where the biggest money is and the A-side gets the lion's share. AJ is the first fighter in history demanding that a major fight take place where it generates half the revenue because he's so desperate for a home referee. It's literally unheard of in boxing history.Comment
-
Who wouldn’t want any a title shot a title shot shot that sounds common sense. Shyte wants to take the easiest road traveled as evidenced when he completely flipped his shytt and threatened to sue the WBC for ordering Ortiz as his mandatory When it was only his fault that he didn’t know own held a trinket that’s didn’t guarantee him a mandatory
Dillian was already the number 1 for the WBC. He shouldn't have to fight all and sundry to get a shot at Wilder.
So Whyte hasn't earned a shot at Deontay even though he has a better resume than Wilder himself? Hahahahahahaha
You're scared for Wilder. I can smell the fear from here. You're pathetic, man.Comment
-
What does Deontay's previous earnings have to do with what he should earn in the future? If you get a job as a cop, you're not going to accept minimum wage because you had previously worked at McDonalds.Comment
-
Maybe Eddie doesn’t know how to put together big fights local promoter would do well to listen to Finkel and HaymonComment
-
Comment
-
Whyte could make more money in a rematch with Joshua in the UK. Why is Hearn not interested in that fight? It makes more financial sense, doesn't it? Wrap your head around the fact that Hearn is using Whyte as a pawn to distract the public from the fight they've been demanding. The public was demanding Joshua-Wilder, and that has not changed. Hearn claimed to be prioritizing that fight, but now he's trying to sell Whyte as a better opponent for Wilder. We're asking the butcher for beef, but he's giving us spam. Don't come here and start telling me about the nutritional value of spam. It's not what we ordered.
Then Joshua and Wilder can take the April date. That's if Wilder comes to his senses and doesn't price himself out.
So who do you think Wilder should fight then if not Whyte?Comment
Comment