I'm genuinely curious about this. People gonna say oh but look at other promoter fights and there refereeing is not good either, I don't give a f about them, I'm talking only about Eddie Hearn and his main even fights because I've been doing some digging and some research and we can go all the way back to Froch/Groves 1 for the crap refereeing to start.
The thing that gets me though, is in every main even fight where you can question the ref, it's ALWAYS a ref who has done something to favour Eddie Hearns fighter, ALWAYS in every single one
Purely a coincidence? Or maybe have the boxing rules changed now?
There must be an answer to this other than just incompetent refs who on EVERY occasion are only incompetent to the opponent.
The thing that gets me though, is in every main even fight where you can question the ref, it's ALWAYS a ref who has done something to favour Eddie Hearns fighter, ALWAYS in every single one
Purely a coincidence? Or maybe have the boxing rules changed now?
There must be an answer to this other than just incompetent refs who on EVERY occasion are only incompetent to the opponent.
Comment