Lochte should have paid the USADA.
Swimmer Ryan Lochte suspended 14 months for illegal IV by USADA (hypocrisy?)
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Plenty of critical thinking there and ALL OF IT was beyond you.
Sorry, but I aint about to waste THAT MUCH time again.
I'd rather your silly azz keep thinking you actually have a point.Comment
-
critical thinking is above your aptitudeComment
-
Here's the common sense part of critical thinking for me. If you have a medical emergency/immediate need for an IV, you're not going to get a TUE approved before you take the IV. Logic says that you'll have to formally and retroactively request the TUE at a point in time after taking the IV.Comment
-
Without all the facts, what is your critical thinking breakdown? Just curious. "Looks guilty" and "is guilty" are two different things. You feign objectivity, yet have ASSUMED that someone or everyone at the USADA were paid to facilitate this IV.
Here's the common sense part of critical thinking for me. If you have a medical emergency/immediate need for an IV, you're not going to get a TUE approved before you take the IV. Logic says that you'll have to formally and retroactively request the TUE at a point in time after taking the IV.
we live in a world where bankers walk away with trillions in bailout for the economic disaster they caused in the first place. that's the official ruling. is the ruling fair or logical?
objective evidence with critical thinking analysis.
Floyd was found with an illegal needle in his arm. FACT.
Floyd broke protocol in the USADA. Fact.
USADA instead of punishing floyd for breaking the rules gave him something new called RETROACTIVE EXemptioN. They made up an exception for him after 21 days. the only other time they gave out that exemption was to another obvious roider, Cyborg.
tell me critically, how that makes any sense. HE INNOCENT CUS THE MAN SAID SO?Last edited by HeadShots; 07-24-2018, 10:19 AM.Comment
-
we live in a world where bankers walk away with trillions in bailout for the economic disaster they caused in the first place. that's the official ruling. is the ruling fair or logical?
objective evidence with critical thinking analysis.
Floyd was found with an illegal needle in his arm. FACT.
Floyd broke protocol in the USADA. Fact.
USADA instead of punishing floyd for breaking the rules gave him something new called RETROACTIVE EXemptioN. They made up an exception for him after 21 days. the only other time they gave out that exemption was to another obvious roider, Cyborg.
tell me critically, how that makes any sense. HE INNOCENT CUS THE MAN SAID SO?
Protocol was followed, not broken.
That's why USADA, with knowledge that an IV had been given, didn't bat an eye when the TUE was eventually applied for 3 weeks later.
It was simply a formality for something all parties were aware of.Comment
Comment