Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How is Crawford ahead of Usyk P4P?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How is Crawford ahead of Usyk P4P?

    Usyk just unified one of the best divisions in boxing against top competition like Gassiev and Briedis. While Crawford's best names are Postol and Gamboa. Both are highly skilled technicians but Usyk has the much better resume. So, how exactly is Crawford rated higher?

  • #2
    Pound for pound isn’t resume for resume it’s if all were the same size who’s the best.

    Crawford is insanely good. He’s better than Usyk IMO. I have Usyk at #3 p4p though. He’s a great fighter.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Sheldon312 View Post
      Usyk just unified one of the best divisions in boxing against top competition like Gassiev and Briedis. While Crawford's best names are Postol and Gamboa. Both are highly skilled technicians but Usyk has the much better resume. So, how exactly is Crawford rated higher?
      Crawford was also the proven top guy at 135.

      Comment


      • #4
        Crawford has dominated everyone he's ever faced and won multiple titles in 3 divisions. Usyk has not. That's the difference. And no he doesn't have a "much better resume." The cruiserweight division isn't that great. The supposed #2 guy is a plodder who has no jab and just stands right in front the other guy eating shots.

        Comment


        • #5
          Presscot. Beltran. Postol. Gamboa (gold medal) Burns. Felix (another gold medal) unfy indongo. Horn. How is usyks resume better then crawfords? In ure mind crawford has to clean out 147 to be higher then usyk while all usyk had to do was beat a guy who went life and death with labadev? Take away the dust from under ure nose.

          Comment


          • #6
            I got nothing on Crawford as he is an insanely good fighter but give someone else his resume and I feel it would be a different story

            Comment


            • #7
              1. Crawford
              1. Lomachenko
              3. Golovkin
              4. Canelo
              5. Usyk

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Sadiqkingofko View Post
                1. Crawford
                1. Lomachenko
                3. Golovkin
                4. Canelo
                5. Usyk
                Ggg? canelo? Gtfo with this bs.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Godsfly View Post
                  Presscot. Beltran. Postol. Gamboa (gold medal) Burns. Felix (another gold medal) unfy indongo. Horn. How is usyks resume better then crawfords? In ure mind crawford has to clean out 147 to be higher then usyk while all usyk had to do was beat a guy who went life and death with labadev? Take away the dust from under ure nose.
                  Gassiev, Bredlis, Huck, and Hunter are better than the guys you mentioned. Unlike you, I do not use race as a determine factor in comparing two fighters.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by pillowfists98 View Post
                    Crawford has dominated everyone he's ever faced and won multiple titles in 3 divisions. Usyk has not. That's the difference. And no he doesn't have a "much better resume." The cruiserweight division isn't that great. The supposed #2 guy is a plodder who has no jab and just stands right in front the other guy eating shots.
                    Crawford has looked dominate because the fighters he has fought are not that great, Of course you are going to look good when all your best wins are B-Level.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP