Tweet
Originally posted by lparm
View Post
-
A 36 year old Joe winning a close split decision over a 43 year old Hopkins.I doubt that is what the thread starter had in mind as a great shut up fight. -
As corny as Broner is at least he still kept on and showed heart. Nahmed got punched and gave up after that, also got fat.Originally posted by Golden Boi 360 View PostComment
-
What a stupid thread. By calling Hamed a c-lass fighter/overrated you take away one of Barrera's greatest wins. Barrera himself said his best victory was over Hamed and was a proud acheivement:
Was Hamed ever c0ccky after a fight towards an opponent? It was all hype and spectacle. It's what paved the way for multi-million contracts for the lower divisions. Also, let's not forget that Barrera thought Hamed shouldn't have resigned and that he was good for boxing:
Barrera tells Naz: "One loss is no big deal" >>> http://www.secondsout.com/archive/an...is-no-big-deal
Actually, he was probably too embarrassed to come back because of leeches like you and the media who think one loss means every fighter is "exposed". Boxing lost some sorely needed entertainment and excitement when Hamed resigned. Only cynical, old farts cheered Hamed's resignation.Comment
-
He was an A Fighter that got beat by an A plus fighterOriginally posted by BoxingOutlaw View PostComment
-
this is only domestic level but its one of my favourites, some of the uk fans might remember it. smith was heavy favourite, pretty hyped at the time and seen at the very least to be a future world title challenger (he also said hed beat lomachenko). jupp was honest that smith used to beat him in sparring and jupp was meant to be a routine win for smith. I like trash talk but smith was absolutely vile in the build up and then jupp gave him a boxing lesson. Smith has pretty much retired since then.Comment
-
Ward vs the Vacant title Paper one FrochComment
-
Floyd schooled Hatton quite bad.
Roy Jones jr vs nearly all of his opponents pre 2004.Comment
Comment