Comments Thread For: Golovkin Prefers Saunders Over Charlo, Murata as Next Fight

[Sigundo]

ggg fans make a lot of excuses for him he’s scared of Charlo just like he was scared of Ward the kept saying Ward was to big for him and that Ward to go fight Krusher and we know how that turned out the same thing with ggg when or if he fights Charlo

[j.razor]

Your nuts......

More gay talk from lil g supporters....Great comeback.

[jonnyc420]

But you can & picking the weak opponents for lil g?? Some "fan" you are. #Twinky

I am picking GGG's opponents? This is news to me. Where is my damn paycheck? I will leave you alone you do a great job making yourself look ****** as it is.

[Jimmy gold]

Those are the ones that scare you the most that's why you say that. #Twinky

Dude go bug someone else I speak facts ur a ****rider

[Sid-Knee]

GGG recently lost his IBF title for refusing to defend against his mandatory. Should he give up his WBC title for the same reason? This is the man who claimed that unifying & defending titles is his ultimate priority. Now his trainer & fans are justifying avoiding mandatory opponents. It's convenient to call Charlo a "hype job", but in reality most experts are impressed by him and fans are eager to see if he can fulfill his potential. Charlo is big, young, and more aggressive than Saunders, and he's less likely to "run" or employ a defensive strategy. Golovkin would rather chase a man who is afraid to engage than to fight a hungry, young lion who is looking for a knockout. It's obvious why GGG would prefer to fight Saunders for the WBO title instead of defending his WBC title.

Unification trumps mandatories. You should know this.

Saunders usually stands his ground, it was only against Lemieux that he used the ring more. And besides, that was a great show of skill and ring IQ. Anyone trying to pour scorn on that performance doesn't like boxing. Simple as that.

Charlo is still unproven no matter what you want to say. If he fights someone with substance and beats them, then the call for the fight will grow. But not until. Saunders is clearly the fight to take out of the 2.

[Sid-Knee]

Comedy. Vanes has been semi-retired for years, and is obviously past his prime. Never mind the fact that he's not really a middleweight. You should have lost respect for Golovkin when he personally selected Vanes to be his opponent. People cannot say Charlo does not deserve a Golovkin fight, and then justify him defending his title against Vanes.

Why can't Vanes give Charlo all he wants? I mean, he beat his brother only for him to get robbed. It would actually be one of the best opponents Charlo has ever fought.

[Sid-Knee]

You're right, and Golovkin would prefer to potentially lose a decision to a man who is afraid to engage, than to potentially get knocked-out by a strong, aggressive, young lion.

When was Saunders afraid to engage? You mean the time he schooled the life out of Lemieux?

You're not bitter about that are you? You are from Canada.

[Slicc]

Saunders is gonna need $15 million, and the fight has to take place in his caravan. If GGG vs Saunders happens, I'm gonna have to look out my window for flying pigs.

[Sid-Knee]

No it's not. You guys just think it will be an easy win for a title that's why you guys want that fight.

Jermall Charlo drops lil g.

Your bias knows no bounds.

If Saunders was American you'd be calling for that fight all day. You'd say Saunders would school G. But he's not so you're calling for a nobody to get the fight instead.

[Sid-Knee]

So what happens if Boo Boo fights & beats bily hoe?

Then G would call to fight Andrade instead wouldn't he? He'd be then more proven than Charlo so would deserve the fight more.