Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Vanes: B*tch Canelo Ran Whole Fight, Cried He Won, Took Roids!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by chubuk7 View Post
    Sergiy? Who is Sergiy? GGG used to not get fights because his opponents weren’t making much money, but now that you can line yourself up for a huge payday, the reward for beating GGG is much higher. It has nothing to do with courage, it’s all business. No more good boy!
    Sergiy is the guy GGG dropped his belt not fighting. He also has a very good amatuer record and if you saw him fight you would know how good he is. At least you admit your a casual fan that doesn't even know about highly ranked boxers.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
      Sergiy is the guy GGG dropped his belt not fighting. He also has a very good amatuer record and if you saw him fight you would know how good he is. At least you admit your a casual fan that doesn't even know about highly ranked boxers.
      C'mon man, GGG and his management didn’t want to fight someone too good with the little time there was to prepare for that fighter and no money. Martirosyan was the perfect opponent. What so hard to understand?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
        End of the day betting wise and most feel Brook/Khan was/is a 50/50 fight. In fact if they fight next Ill drop some $$$ on Khan against you.

        You can hype up Brook all you want but he was a CHAMP at 147 NOT 160.
        stop it you degenerate gambler. I'm not betting with some flake on a website but if you bet anyone that khan will beat brook, you'd lose your money. Any it'd be even more guranateed that the version of brook that was undefeated at welter would've beaten that version of khan that damn near lost to algieri. You can defend Canelo all you want but he's the one criticizing opponents when he has no space to do so. Khan, Smith and Chavez jr, back to back to back??? gtfoh

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by DuckAdonis View Post
          I didnt like the fight at all, but i blame Canelo for that ****...GGG was supposed to fight him. And Andrade lmao are you serious ?! That guy is soo unreliable, he always pulls out of fights...signing a fight with him on short notice would be ridiculous.
          1. Correct (Pednelo)
          2. Correct. (Andrade)
          3. Correct (If you mean Sergiy)

          But they should of just paid Spike what originally agreed upon. I dont like when ppl change agreed, NEGOTIATED contracts last minute. And this wasn't their 1st time doing it to boxers.

          Hindsight 20/20 but now I wish the NAC approved Jaime. but that could of David Reed'd him...

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            stop it you degenerate gambler. I'm not betting with some flake on a website but if you bet anyone that khan will beat brook, you'd lose your money. Any it'd be even more guranateed that the version of brook that was undefeated at welter would've beaten that version of khan that damn near lost to algieri. You can defend Canelo all you want but he's the one criticizing opponents when he has no space to do so. Khan, Smith and Chavez jr, back to back to back??? gtfoh
            Im too lazy but I could copy and paste GGG's entire resume and outside Jacobs, Canelo is full of guys < Smith, Khan, Chavez by FAR!

            Post his resume for me??? I need a good laugh.

            Comment


            • #26
              Vanes is on point
              That dude has more Balls than Ginger, fishnets and cheapo

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                stop it you degenerate gambler. I'm not betting with some flake on a website but if you bet anyone that khan will beat brook, you'd lose your money. Any it'd be even more guranateed that the version of brook that was undefeated at welter would've beaten that version of khan that damn near lost to algieri. You can defend Canelo all you want but he's the one criticizing opponents when he has no space to do so. Khan, Smith and Chavez jr, back to back to back??? gtfoh
                If you say Brook would beat Khan then NOW I'm FOR SURE Brook loses. Everyone you take LOSES!

                Who you got in Pac/Matty???

                You taking GGG by KO again??? I hope so!

                When was the last time youve been right?

                LMAO I forgot you took Pac in the Mayweather fight!

                Comment


                • #28
                  A clean Canelo is a journeyman and a sparring Partner @ 168 pounds

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by chubuk7 View Post
                    C'mon man, GGG and his management didn’t want to fight someone too good with the little time there was to prepare for that fighter and no money. Martirosyan was the perfect opponent. What so hard to understand?
                    I 100% agree. Buisness side it would of been beyond dumb. Sergiy would of been a VERY tough out. GGG would of been favored but Sergiy would have a good chance of winning. I would of pegged the fight at GGG 65-70% Chance of winning. -180 to -220.

                    That risk isnt worth 45% of a fight going to make HUGE $$$$$.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Vanes is right and fought more over 2 rounds and showed more heart than Canelo did over 12 rounds. Vanes would also beat most of Canelo opponents, including Kirkland, Khan and Liam Smith, so Canelo shouldn’t dismiss him like that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP